首页> 外文期刊>International journal of humanoid robotics >NOTE ON THE ARTICLE 'ZERO-MOMENT POINT - THIRTY FIVE YEARS OF ITS LIFE'
【24h】

NOTE ON THE ARTICLE 'ZERO-MOMENT POINT - THIRTY FIVE YEARS OF ITS LIFE'

机译:关于“零时刻-寿命三十五年”的说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Vol. 1, No. 1 of Int. J. Humanoid Rubotics, we gave a review of the Zero-Moment Point (ZMP) concept, on the occasion of thirty five years of its use in modeling dynamics of the biped gait. At the time of writing this article, we thought that thirty five years was a long enough period in which all confusions, if they existed, could be cleared up. However, we were not quite right, and we will indicate here some of the most important points concerning the concept. A survey of the literature that appeared in the last several years related to the widely accepted ZMP method reveals a diversity of terms used to describe the state in which the biped system performs "regular" gait, safe from overturning. The terms in use are: stability (stable gait), dynamic balance, and dynamic equilibrium. Stability is a customary term in the theory of automatic control, and in this domain it has its well-defined meaning and usage, so that it is not appropriate to use it in some other instances, straying from its basic meaning. The term dynamic equilibrium is also unsuitable because it is used in the D'Alambert principle to transform dynamic equations into a static form, with a zero on the right-hand side - hence the term equilibrium. Therefore, dynamic balance remains the most appropriate term, as it fully reflects the nature of the related notion, and is not in use in other areas. We ourselves did not make clear this terminological distinction in the aforementioned article, which would have been prudent.
机译:在卷。国际公开赛第1号,第1号。 J. Humanoid Rubotics,我们在零力矩点(ZMP)概念被用于Biped步态动力学建模的35年之际进行了回顾。在撰写本文时,我们认为三十五年是一个足够长的时期,可以消除所有的混淆(如果存在)。但是,我们不太正确,我们将在此处说明有关该概念的一些最重要的观点。最近几年对与广泛接受的ZMP方法有关的文献的调查显示,用于描述Biped系统执行“常规”步态的状态的术语多种多样,可以防止倾覆。使用的术语是:稳定性(步态稳定),动态平衡和动态平衡。稳定性是自动控制理论中的惯用术语,在这个领域中,它具有明确定义的含义和用法,因此在某些其他情况下,从其基本含义出发,不宜使用它。术语“动态平衡”也不适用,因为它在D'Alambert原理中用于将动态方程式转换为静态形式,右侧为零,因此称为“平衡”。因此,动态平衡仍然是最合适的术语,因为它充分反映了相关概念的性质,并且未在其他领域使用。我们本人在前面的文章中并没有明确表示这种术语上的区别,这是很谨慎的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号