首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Human Resource Management >‘Change or hold: reexamining HRM to meet new challenges and demands’: the future of people at work: a reflection on diverging human resource management policies and practices in Dutch organizations
【24h】

‘Change or hold: reexamining HRM to meet new challenges and demands’: the future of people at work: a reflection on diverging human resource management policies and practices in Dutch organizations

机译:“改变或持有:重新审视人力资源管理局,以应对新的挑战和要求”:工作人员的未来:对荷兰组织中不同的人力资源管理政策和实践的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As a consequence of continual change pressures on everyday organizations, a gradual but noticeable shift is taking place in the way managers and employees view the employment relationship. Expectation patterns between both parties are starting to diverge into what seems to be new forms of managing people, based on different assumptions regarding their importance in the (knowledge based) economy. Traditional differences in employment expectations between superiors and their subordinates, between higher and lesser educated and between intrinsically and extrinsically motivated employees, are currently making place for differences between younger and older knowledge workers and for diversity and professionalism. In this article, HRM is contrasted against two emerging approaches towards the management of people, which are currently subsets of HRM, but gaining momentum as potential replacements for HRM. First, we identify ‘Transaction-based Management of People (TM)’ in which the employment relationship mirrors that of a financially driven exchange relationship, similar to transaction economics. We refer to the second approach as ‘Professional-based Management of People (PM)’ in which the nature of the employment relationship reflects the recognition of people in organizations as ‘true’ professionals who know best what constitutes superior business performance. These approaches have been empirically examined by means of a representative survey among Dutch directors and managers.View full textDownload full textKeywordsemployment relationship, human resources management, professionals management, transaction managementRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585191003658813
机译:由于日常组织面临不断变化的压力,管理人员和雇员对待雇佣关系的方式正在发生逐渐但明显的转变。基于关于人们在(基于知识的)经济中重要性的不同假设,双方之间的期望模式开始分化为看似新的管理人形式。上级与下级之间,受过高等教育的人员与受过高等教育的人员之间,以及具有内在和外在动机的雇员之间的传统的就业期望差异,目前正在为年轻与年长的知识工作者之间的差异以及多样性和专业性创造条件。在本文中,将人力资源管理与两种新兴的人员管理方法进行了对比,这两种方法目前是人力资源管理的一部分,但随着人力资源管理的潜在替代而获得发展。首先,我们确定“基于交易的人员管理(TM)”,其中雇佣关系与财务驱动的交换关系的镜像相似,类似于交易经济学。我们将第二种方法称为“基于人员的专业管理(PM)”,其中雇佣关系的性质反映了人们对组织中人员的认可,即他们最了解什么是真正的专业人员。卓越的业务绩效。这些方法已通过在荷兰董事和经理中进行的代表性调查进行了经验检验。查看全文下载全文关键字雇佣关系,人力资源管理,专业人员管理,交易管理citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585191003658813

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号