...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of the History of Sport >Sport, Urbanity and Communal Socialism: The Case of ‘Red Zurich’ (1928-1949)
【24h】

Sport, Urbanity and Communal Socialism: The Case of ‘Red Zurich’ (1928-1949)

机译:体育,城市与社区社会主义:“红色苏黎世”案(1928-1949)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article analyses opportunities, limitations and impact of communal sport policies in the second quarter of the 20th century by the example of Zurich, the largest city of Switzerland. The period of ‘Red Zurich’ from 1928 to 1949, when a Social Democratic majority committed to the strategy of ‘communal socialism’ dominated the city's executive council, was at the same time the take-off period of both mass and commercialised elite sport. Yet, unlike in ‘Red Vienna’, a specifically socialist approach of ‘Red Zurich’ towards sport is hardly identifiable, with the city administration not privileging worker sports organisations ideologically close to them nor applying any theories of class specific physical education. Rather their policies were in line with contemporary mainstream discourses on health, hygiene and problems posed by modern urbanity. The same can be said regarding the development of sport infrastructure, which despite economic crisis and wartime austerity witnessed a rapid expansion and was closely intertwined with policy fields such as city planning (including the development of green spaces) and job creation. The Social Democratic government considerably improved the position of citizens’ sport activities, but also looked favourably upon private initiatives to build large stadiums, reflecting the increasing importance of mass spectator sport. On balance, ‘Red Zurich's’ sport policies epitomised their overall agenda not to be a hotbed of revolutionary experiments, but an example of solid progressive communal administration.View full textDownload full textKeywordsRed Zurich, communal socialism, stadium building, interwar period, SwitzerlandRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2012.666970
机译:本文以瑞士最大的城市苏黎世为例,分析了20世纪第二个季度公共体育政策的机遇,局限和影响。 1928年至1949年的“红色苏黎世”时期,当时致力于执行“社区社会主义”战略的社会民主党多数统治了该市的执行委员会,与此同时,这两个时期都处于起步阶段。大众化和商业化的精英运动。然而,与“红色维也纳”不同的是,“红色苏黎世”对体育运动的专门社会主义方法难以确定,城市行政部门既不让工人体育组织在意识形态上与他们近距离接触,也不应用任何特定于阶级的理论体育。相反,他们的政策与关于健康,卫生和现代城市化带来的问题的当代主流论述相一致。关于体育基础设施的发展可以说是相同的,尽管经济危机和战时紧缩,但体育基础设施仍在迅速发展,并与城市规划(包括开发绿地)和创造就业机会等政策领域紧密相关。社会民主党政府大大改善了公民的体育活动的地位,但也积极看待私人倡议建造大型体育场,这反映了群众体育运动的重要性日益提高。总的来说,“红色苏黎世”的体育政策体现了它们的整体议程,而不是革命性实验的温床,而是扎实的进步的公共行政的一个例子。查看全文下载全文关键字“红色苏黎世”,社区社会主义,体育场建设,两次世界大战期间,瑞士相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2012.666970

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号