...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Heritage Studies >Managing beyond designations: supporting endogenous processes for nurturing biocultural development
【24h】

Managing beyond designations: supporting endogenous processes for nurturing biocultural development

机译:超越指定范围的管理:支持内生过程以培育生物文化发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past decade the concept of biocultural diversity has emerged in scholarly and policy circles as an acknowledgement that biological and cultural diversity are interconnected and interdependent, and equally threatened. A significant portion of the world’s biocultural diversity is found within indigenous territories, where indigenous peoples have historically managed a coevolutionary relationship between their communities and their land. This suggests that endogenous processes within indigenous territories are important for a continued nurturing of biocultural diversity. Emerging designations used for conservation of biocultural diversity can be useful, but by themselves are unable to protect the ongoing relationships and processes that create and nurture the diversity. In this paper, we argue that it is important to move beyond conservation-driven management models towards models that support endogenous processes. Designations for biocultural diversity, accordingly, need to recognise that people, biodiversity and place are best managed as an interconnected whole, and actively support the well-being and self-determination of indigenous peoples. We use examples from Panama (indigenous Kuna Yala territory) and New Zealand (Mataura Mātaitai Reserve, Southland) to reflect upon the ongoing role of endogenous processes and how they interact with exogenous designations. Through the case studies we illustrate the importance of contextualising our understanding of biocultural diversity as part of endogenous development to recognise wider issues of indigenous rights. Finally, we offer some lessons for managing beyond designations and supporting endogenous processes.View full textDownload full textKeywordsendogenous development, self-determination, indigenous peoples, interconnected, conservation, biocultural diversity, Kuna Yala, Mataura, mātaitaiRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.618250
机译:在过去的十年中,生物文化多样性的概念出现在学术界和政策界,是对生物和文化多样性相互联系,相互依存,同等受到威胁的承认。在土著领土内发现了世界上很大一部分的生物文化多样性,土著人民在历史上曾成功地管理着其社区与土地之间的共同进化关系。这表明,土著领土内的内生过程对于继续培育生物文化多样性很重要。用于保护生物文化多样性的新兴名称可能是有用的,但它们本身无法保护创造和培育多样性的现行关系和过程。在本文中,我们认为重要的是要超越保护驱动的管理模型,而转向支持内在过程的模型。因此,对生物文化多样性的名称需要认识到,人,生物多样性和地方最好作为一个相互联系的整体进行管理,并积极支持土著人民的福祉和自决。我们使用来自巴拿马(库纳亚拉土著领土)和新西兰(南塔拉马泰玛泰泰自然保护区)的例子来反思内源性过程的持续作用以及它们如何与外源性指称相互作用。通过案例研究,我们说明了将我们对生物文化多样性的理解作为背景的重要性,作为内生发展的一部分,以承认更广泛的土著权利问题。最后,我们提供了一些有关管理超出指定范围和支持内生过程的课程。查看全文下载全文关键词内生发展,自决,土著人民,相互联系,保护,生物文化多样性,库纳亚拉,马塔乌拉,泰泰语相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand: “泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.618250

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号