...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Hematology >Analysis of efficacy and cost-effectiveness of high-dose arabinoside versus daunorubicin chemotherapy in older adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia by cytogenetic risk profile: retrospective review from China
【24h】

Analysis of efficacy and cost-effectiveness of high-dose arabinoside versus daunorubicin chemotherapy in older adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia by cytogenetic risk profile: retrospective review from China

机译:通过细胞遗传学危险因素分析大剂量阿糖苷与柔红霉素化疗对老年急性髓性白血病患者的疗效和成本效益:来自中国的回顾性回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

High-dose arabinoside (HiDAC) and daunorubicin (DNR)-based chemotherapy are the primary consolidation treatment options for older adults (50–60 years old) with acute myeloid leukemia in China. We analyzed the event-free survival (EFS) and hospital treatment charges of older adult patients with different cytogenetic risk profiles. In patients with a better/intermediate risk profile, the average total treatment cost of HiDAC was similar to that of DNR (P = 0.11). A 5-year follow-up of patients with better/intermediate cytogenetic risk profiles revealed that the median EFS of patients who received HiDAC was significantly longer than for patients who received the DNR-based regimen (27 vs. 20 months, P = 0.03). Average cost per year of life saved was 18,746.84 USD for HiDAC, compared to 32,733.37 USD for DNR. In contrast, for patients with a poor cytogenetic risk profile, the average total treatment cost for HiDAC was higher than for DNR (P < 0.005). In addition, the median EFS in the HiDAC protocol group was significantly lower than in the DNR group (11 vs. 20 months, P = 0.003). Meanwhile, in this risk group, the average cost per year of life saved was 103,237.70 USD compared to 32,277.93 USD, respectively, in the HiDAC and DNR regimens. We conclude that HiDAC is a more efficacious and cost-effective consolidation treatment regimen in the better/intermediate risk group, while the DNR-based regimen is more cost-effective in the poor risk group.
机译:基于大剂量阿糖苷(HiDAC)和柔红霉素(DNR)的化学疗法是中国患有急性髓样白血病的老年人(50-60岁)的主要巩固治疗选择。我们分析了具有不同细胞遗传学风险特征的成年患者的无事件生存(EFS)和医院治疗费用。在风险状况较好/中度的患者中,HiDAC的平均总治疗费用与DNR相似(P = 0.11)。对具有更好/中等细胞遗传学风险特征的患者进行的5年随访表明,接受HiDAC的患者的中位EFS明显比接受基于DNR的患者的中位EFS更长(27 vs. 20个月,P = 0.03) 。 HiDAC每年挽救生命的平均成本为18,746.84美元,而DNR为32,733.37美元。相反,对于细胞遗传学风险较差的患者,HiDAC的平均总治疗费用高于DNR(P <0.005)。此外,HiDAC协议组的EFS中位数显着低于DNR组(11个月与20个月,P = 0.003)。同时,在该风险组中,每年挽救生命的平均成本为103,237.70美元,而HiDAC和DNR方案分别为32,277.93美元。我们得出结论,在较高/中等风险组中,HiDAC是一种更有效,成本效益更高的合并治疗方案,而在不良风险组中,基于DNR的方案更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号