...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of green energy >On the causality between energy efficiency and technological innovations: limitations and implications
【24h】

On the causality between energy efficiency and technological innovations: limitations and implications

机译:论能源效率与技术创新的因果关系:限制与含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although evidence of technological efficiency effect on decreasing energy intensity is documented in a number of studies, there has been a very few detailed investigations of the causality between the variables. Thus, this paper examines the causal relationship between energy efficiency and technological innovations in nine EU countries during 1980-2013. Using the bootstrap panel Granger causality approach, the study finds evidence of a bidirectional causality in Germany, unidirectional causality running from technological innovations to energy efficiency in Denmark, Sweden, France and Austria, and from energy efficiency to technological innovation in Belgium. No causality at any direction is found in the Netherlands, the UK, and Italy. The lack of causality maybe due to a "rebound" effect", reducing the energy savings from the efficiency improvement. To achieve the global goal of energy intensity, the policy implication of our results suggests that enhancing technological innovations and energy efficiency must be accompanied by taxation and regulations or followed by alternative energy sources such as solar or wind energy generated power in achieving optimal climate benefits.
机译:虽然在许多研究中记录了技术效率对降低能源强度的效率的证据,但是在多项研究中记录了对变量之间的因果关系的详细研究。因此,本文介绍了1980 - 2013年九欧国家能源效率与技术创新的因果关系。使用自举面板格兰杰因果关系方法,该研究发现德国双向因果关系的证据,从丹麦,瑞典,法国和奥地利的技术创新运行的单向因果关系,以及比利时技术创新的能源效率。在荷兰,英国和意大利没有发现任何方向的因果关系。缺乏因果关系可能是由于“反弹”效应“,从而降低了效率改善的节能。为了实现能源强度的全球目标,我们的结果的政策意义表明,加强技术创新和能源效率必须伴随税务和规定或随后是替代能源,如太阳能或风能产生的力量,实现了最佳的气候效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号