首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Game Theory >Can players avoid the tragedy of the commons in a joint debt game?
【24h】

Can players avoid the tragedy of the commons in a joint debt game?

机译:玩家可以避免在联合债务游戏中悲伤的公共悲剧吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Joint debts are debts that more than one debtor guarantees mutually. They are sometimes interpreted as a version of the tragedy of the commons. However, a simple model of the dynamic tragedy of the commons fails to capture an important feature of joint debts. The authors model joint debts as a joint borrowing limit game and compare the model with the dynamic tragedy of the commons model. Thereby, the authors show the difference in the achievability of efficiency between these two models and present the conditions for efficiency. The conditions for efficiency are as follows: (i) a not too large economic disparity between the players; (ii) not too many players. The joint borrowing limit game has a broad range of applications because the model can be applied to a case where creditors and debtors expect a debt guarantee of someone unilaterally even without an explicit contract of joint debt. For example, this model can be applied to the Eurosystem that led to Greek overborrowing.
机译:联合债务是债务,以至于一个以上的债务人担保。它们有时被解释为公共悲剧的版本。但是,公共悲剧的简单模型未能捕捉联合债务的重要特征。作者将联合债务模型作为联合借贷限制游戏,并将模型与Commons模型的动态悲剧进行比较。因此,作者展示了这两种模型之间的效率之间可实现性的差异,并呈现了效率的条件。效率的条件如下:(i)球员之间的经济差异不是太大; (ii)没有太多的球员。联合借款限制游戏具有广泛的应用程序,因为即使没有明确的联合债务合同,该模型也可以应用于债权人和债务人预计各方面债务保障的情况。例如,该模型可以应用于导致希腊过度记录的欧元系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号