首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Game Theory >Matching with restricted trade
【24h】

Matching with restricted trade

机译:与限制贸易相匹配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Motivated by various trade restrictions in real-life object allocation problems, we introduce an object allocation with a particular class of trade restrictions model. The set of matchings that can occur through a market-like process under such restrictions is defined, and each such matching is called feasible. We then introduce a class of mechanisms, which we refer to as "Restricted Trading Cycles" (RTC). Any RTC mechanism is feasible, constrained efficient, and respects endowments. An axiomatic characterization of RTC is obtained, with feasibility, constrained efficiency, and a new property that we call hierarchically mutual best. In terms of strategic issues, feasibility, constrained efficiency, and respecting endowments together turns out to be incompatible with strategy-proofness. This in particular implies that no RTC mechanism is strategy-proof. Lastly, we consider a probabilistically restricted trading cycles (PRTC) mechanism, which is obtained by introducing a certain randomness to the RTC class. While PRTC continues to be manipulable, compared to RTC, it is more robust to truncations and reshufflings.
机译:在现实生活中的对象分配问题中,由于各种贸易限制的推动,我们引入了具有特定类别的贸易限制模型的对象分配。定义了在类似限制条件下可以通过类似市场的过程发生的一组匹配,并且将每个这样的匹配称为可行。然后,我们介绍一类机制,我们称为“限制交易周期”(RTC)。任何RTC机制都是可行的,受约束的有效机制并尊重捐赠。获得了RTC的公理化特征,具有可行性,受限的效率以及我们称之为层次上相互最佳的新属性。在战略问题上,可行性,受限的效率以及对捐赠的尊重都与战略证明不兼容。这尤其意味着,没有RTC机制可以证明其策略性。最后,我们考虑概率限制的交易周期(PRTC)机制,该机制是通过将特定的随机性引入RTC类而获得的。与RTC相比,PRTC仍可操纵,但对截断和改组更为健壮。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号