【24h】

The value of fashion design at universities

机译:大学时装设计的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sir Ken Robinson (2006) gave a fascinating and entertaining lecture entitled 'How Schools Kill Creativity'. Even as long ago as 2006, he concluded that the whole public education system around the world is dominated by a protracted process of gaining university entrance, which has as its 'pinnacle' the goal of producing university professors with PhDs. As a result of selection processes based largely on academic ability, he argued that typical academics can sometimes be described as dis-embodied or detached from the rest of the world. He also raised the issue of the extent to which higher education should be geared towards meeting the needs of modern society and industry, suggesting that the status quo is that the more useful the discipline is for obtaining a 'safe' career, the more that discipline is valued in the education system. For example, subjects such as engineering, which are likely to lead students to well paid jobs remain at the top of the highly valued subject list by both universities and society whilst the art subjects are often left nearer the bottom of the hierarchy in terms of status.
机译:肯·罗宾逊爵士(Sir Ken Robinson,2006年)作了题为“学校如何扼杀创造力”的有趣且有趣的演讲。甚至早在2006年,他就得出结论,整个世界范围内的公共教育系统都以旷日持久的获取大学录取过程为主导,这是其“顶峰”目标,即培养具有博士学位的大学教授。由于选拔过程主要基于学术能力,他认为典型的学者有时可被描述为与世界其他地方无形或分离。他还提出了高等教育应在多大程度上满足现代社会和工业需求的问题,并指出现状是该学科对获得“安全”职业越有用,则该学科越多在教育体系中得到重视。例如,诸如工程学等很可能导致学生获得高薪工作的科目,在大学和社会两方面都一直处于高价值科目列表的首位,而艺术科目通常在地位上却排在最底层。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号