首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management >A comparative study of hexavalent chromium estimation in drinking water by direct aspiration method and chelation extraction method
【24h】

A comparative study of hexavalent chromium estimation in drinking water by direct aspiration method and chelation extraction method

机译:直接抽吸法与螯合萃取法估算饮用水中六价铬的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the development of industries, an increase in the discharge of toxic effluent has been observed which causes detrimental effects on living creatures and the environment. This study is mainly focused on estimation methods of hexavalent chromium in drinking water samples and their comparison. The study area is the state of Gujarat in India, and touches South Gujarat where industries have proliferated. In the present work, a comparative study has been done using two different methods for the estimation of hexavalent chromium in drinking water. The results show that chelation extraction method (CEM) is better as compared to direct aspiration method (DAM). Furthermore, we have established that the hexavalent chromium content in drinking water samples collected from the South Gujarat area is several folds higher as compared to the permissible limits suggested by Public Health Goal which is 0.02 ppb.
机译:随着工业的发展,已经观察到有毒废水的排放增加,这对生物和环境产生有害影响。这项研究主要集中在饮用水样品中六价铬的估算方法及其比较上。研究区域位于印度的古吉拉特邦(Gujarat)州,并且接触了工业蓬勃发展的南古吉拉特邦南部。在目前的工作中,已经使用两种不同的方法进行了比较研究,以估算饮用水中的六价铬。结果表明,螯合萃取法(CEM)比直接抽吸法(DAM)更好。此外,我们已经确定,从南古吉拉特邦地区采集的饮用水样品中的六价铬含量比《公共卫生目标》建议的0.02 ppb的允许限值高出几倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号