...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Educational Management >Implementing the global model of the research university in a national context: perspectives of deans and departments heads
【24h】

Implementing the global model of the research university in a national context: perspectives of deans and departments heads

机译:在国家背景下实施研究大学的全球模式:院长和部门头的角度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This article aims to explore the implications of means-ends decoupling at the state level for the implementation of the global model of the research university by the deans and department heads. Means-ends decoupling at the state level implies that the policies and practices of the state are disconnected from its core goal of creating public welfare. Design/methodology/approach - Data that form the basis of analysis were collected through twenty-four semi-structured interviews with deans and department heads from the humanities, social sciences and natural sciences who were in their positions during 2010-2014, at two Ukrainian universities. Findings - Apart from means-ends decoupling at the state level, which resulted in institutional complexity, case universities also sustained means-ends decoupling at the organisational level, which led to cultural complexity. Institutional and cultural complexities experienced by the deans and department heads, as well as their practices and values deviated from the global model of the research university, entailed them sustaining means-ends decoupling at the individual level. The degree of means-ends decoupling maintained by the deans and department heads at the individual level varied depending on organisational, disciplinary and individual cultural dimensions. Originality/value - This research contributes to the policy development and implementation studies highlighting how mismatches in policies at both state and organisational levels hinder the achievement of the intended outcomes.
机译:目的 - 本文旨在探讨院长和部门负责人在州立一级执行国家一级的州级的含义。在国家级的意味着结束脱耦意味着国家的政策和实践与创建公共福利的核心目标断开连接。设计/方法/方法 - 形成分析基础的数据通过与院长,社会科学和自然科学的二十四个半结构化访谈收集到2010 - 2014年在乌克兰两次职位的人文学科,社会科学和自然科学领域大学。调查结果 - 除了州立一级的平均线路分离,导致机构复杂性,案例大学也在组织层面持续到脱耦,这导致了文化复杂性。院长和部门负责人的机构和文化复杂性以及从研究大学的全球模式偏离的实践和价值观,要求他们在个人层面上维持手段结束去耦。院长和部门负责人维护的手段结束的程度根据组织,纪律和个人文化维度而变化。原创性/价值 - 这项研究有助于突出政策制定和实施研究,突出了国家和组织层面的政策中的不匹配妨碍了实现预期结果的实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号