首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Ecology & Enviromental Sciences >Towards Addressing Societal Concerns: Moving Through Genecology and Ecosystems to Socio-Ecological Systems
【24h】

Towards Addressing Societal Concerns: Moving Through Genecology and Ecosystems to Socio-Ecological Systems

机译:致力于解决社会问题:从遗传学和生态系统过渡到社会生态系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Having been trained in biophysical dimensions of ecology with an ecosystem approach, the move towards a larger interdisciplinary approach with emphasis on socio-ecological systems analysis with implications to related ecological studies to societal concerns was indeed a challenging task. Having had to face with differential paradigms determining natural vs. social sciences, it was soon realized that arriving at compromises between these two knowledge streams holds the key for addressing sustainability concerns in the area of natural resource management linked with livelihood/developmental concerns of human societies ranging from the very 'traditional' to the most 'modern'. In such an effort, 'knowledge systems', particularly 'traditional ecological knowledge' (TEK) available with local communities through an experiential process was considered the key towards linking the biophysical with the socio-economic-cultural dimensions of the issues under consideration, bringing in text-book based 'formal ecological knowledge' to the extent required and appropriate depending upon what the socio-ecological situation demands. Very traditional societies living close to nature and natural resources around them may have to have TEK being brought in to a much larger degree so as to avoid social disruptions setting in, compared to the more modern societies who may need TEK only to be brought in so as to create buffering mechanisms within the socio-ecological system and thus cope up with the ill-effects arising from excessive use of energy-intensive technologies. In other words, community participatory approaches based on a value system that they understand and appreciate and therefore can participate in the process of conservation linked sustainable development is the key to combat environmental uncertainties, arising on one hand from ecological 'global change' and on the other economic 'globalization'. This is an emerging area of study in which I have had the privilege of getting involved towards understanding socio-ecclogical system structure and functions, the inspiration for which came from my teacher, late Professor R. Misra who always encouraged me to move away from the trodden path; and to a great measure from very traditional societies who have always valued their closeness to 'nature', and which formed the basis of their cultural identity. This paper is a summary of what I have been able to do when I moved into the realm of 'socio-ecological systems analysis', in the early 1970s, from an 'ecosystem analysis' approach which I pursued for the first two decades of my ecological researches.
机译:在接受了采用生态系统方法进行生态学的生物物理方面的培训之后,转向更大的跨学科方法,重点是对社会生态系统分析的研究,对相关生态学研究对社会问题的影响确实是一项艰巨的任务。不得不面对确定自然科学与社会科学的不同范式之后,很快就意识到,在这两种知识流之间达成折衷解决了解决自然资源管理领域与人类社会生计/发展问题相关的可持续性问题的关键从最“传统”到最“现代”。通过这种努力,认为“知识体系”,特别是通过体验过程可与当地社区共享的“传统生态知识”(TEK),是将生物物理与所考虑问题的社会经济文化联系起来的关键,在基于教科书的“正式生态知识”中,取决于社会生态状况的要求。与那些可能只需要将TEK引入社会的较现代社会相比,与自然和自然资源接近的非常传统的社会可能不得不更大程度地引入TEK,以避免社会混乱的形成。以在社会生态系统内建立缓冲机制,从而应对因过度使用能源密集型技术而产生的不良影响。换句话说,基于他们理解和欣赏并因此可以参与与保护相关的可持续发展过程的价值体系的社区参与式方法,是抵御环境不确定性的关键,这一方面一方面源于生态“全球变化”,另一方面源于生态系统。其他经济“全球化”。这是一个新兴的研究领域,我有幸参与到理解社会生态系统的结构和功能中来,我的老师R. Misra教授一直是我的鼓舞。践踏的道路并在非常传统的社会中取得了很大的成就,这些社会一直重视与“自然”的亲密关系,并构成了其文化认同的基础。本文是对我在1970年代初进入“社会生态系统分析”领域时能够做的工作的总结,该方法是我在最初的二十年中一直追求的“生态系统分析”方法生态研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号