...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of decision support system technology >Improvement of the Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation Method and Comparison with the AHP Method
【24h】

Improvement of the Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation Method and Comparison with the AHP Method

机译:一致模糊偏好关系法的改进及与层次分析法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AHP is always a popular method adopted by researchers in dealing with the issues of multiple criteria decision making. However, with the increase in the criteria, the traditional AHP may cause a problem in terms of the consistency of the questionnaires. Later on, the method of Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relation was developed to resolve such issue. But currently the utilization rate of this method is low, -probably because most researchers still doubt the result of the CFPR method. The main purpose of this study is using experiment and statistics analysis to compare the two methods. The final report shows that the results obtained by the CFFR method and the traditional AHP method are similar. It indicates CFPR is a good method for dealing with the MCDM problem. Moreover, this study also proposes a suggestion to improve the CFPR, so as to resolve the issue of screening out the valid questionnaires. Finally, this study used the CFPR method to code the software for use of follow-up researchers.
机译:AHP一直是研究人员在处理多标准决策问题时采用的一种流行方法。但是,随着标准的增加,传统的层次分析法可能会在问卷一致性方面造成问题。后来,开发了一致的模糊偏好关系方法来解决该问题。但是目前这种方法的利用率很低,这可能是因为大多数研究人员仍然对CFPR方法的结果表示怀疑。这项研究的主要目的是使用实验和统计分析来比较这两种方法。最终报告显示,通过CFFR方法和传统AHP方法获得的结果相似。这表明CFPR是解决MCDM问题的好方法。此外,本研究还提出了改善CFPR的建议,以解决筛选有效问卷的问题。最后,本研究使用CFPR方法对软件进行编码,以供后续研究人员使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号