首页> 外文期刊>International journal of crashworthiness >Comparison of two child seats subjected to a regulatory side impact regarding biomechanical criteria associated to the newborn
【24h】

Comparison of two child seats subjected to a regulatory side impact regarding biomechanical criteria associated to the newborn

机译:在与新生儿相关的生物力学标准方面受到法规性负面影响的两个儿童座椅的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The new Regulation 129 is a keystone in child safety as child restraint systems are now evaluated in side impact tests with Q-dummies. Research works have, nevertheless, shown that regulatory assessment criteria are not well correlated with head injuries. As a consequence, the present study aims to compare two child seat versions regarding biomechanical criteria associated to the anatomical head-neck system of the newborn. The main results show that the enhanced child seat leads to significative lower brain loading under regulatory test configuration.
机译:新的129号法规是儿童安全的基石,因为现在已经通过Q型假人的侧面碰撞测试对儿童约束系统进行了评估。然而,研究工作表明,监管评估标准与头部受伤没有很好的相关性。因此,本研究旨在比较两种与新生儿解剖学头颈系统相关的生物力学标准的儿童座椅。主要结果表明,在调节测试配置下,增强的儿童座椅可显着降低大脑负荷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号