首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Consumer Studies >Intentions of formally qualified and unqualified teachers to transfer norms and values in home economics teaching
【24h】

Intentions of formally qualified and unqualified teachers to transfer norms and values in home economics teaching

机译:正式合格和不合格教师在家庭经济学教学中转移规范和价值观的意图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Historically, home economics (HE) in general, and the consumer education sections in particular, have been criticized for transferring norms and values of conservative elites to the masses. This is in stark contrast to contemporary theoretical views of a modern HE aimed at educating emancipated and critical citizens, and also to modern curricula that emphasize the consequences of consumption rather than dogma. A previous study has indicated that formally unqualified teachers see the transfer of consumption norms and values without support in the curriculum as an important objective of HE teaching, a practice that is questionable from a democratic perspective. This follow-up study investigates to what extent formally qualified HE teachers show intentions to transfer consumption norms and values without support in the curriculum to students, using content analysis of 201 survey responses from Swedish qualified HE teachers and comparing to data from a previously published study on formally unqualified teachers. It is concluded that the qualified teachers demonstrate intentions to transfer unsupported norms and values, though, to a lower degree than unqualified teachers. The results are interpreted by adopting a values education perspective on HE. This indicates that the observed emphasis on norms and values could be seen partly as a lack of a proficient professional metalanguage among the teachers, and partly as a consequence of the focus on developing a pre-defined moral of consumption in HE literature. The implications on how to develop HE teacher education to reduce norm and value transfer intentions are discussed based on the empirical findings and the theoretical framework.
机译:从历史上看,一般批评家政经济学,尤其是消费者教育部分,因为它们将保守精英的规范和价值观转移给了大众。这与旨在教育解放和批判的公民的现代高等教育的当代理论观点形成鲜明对比,也与强调消费后果而非教条的现代课程形成鲜明对比。先前的一项研究表明,形式不合格的教师将消费规范和价值观的转移视为课程教学的一个重要目标,即在课程中不提供支持,这从民主的角度是值得怀疑的。这项后续研究调查了瑞典合格的高等学校教师对201项问卷调查的内容分析,并与先前发表的研究结果进行了比较,调查了正式合格的高等学校教师在何种程度上表示有意在课程中不向学生转移消费规范和价值观的意图正式不合格的老师。结论是,合格的教师表现出转移不支持的规范和价值观的意图,但是其程度要低于不合格的教师。通过采用关于高等教育的价值观教育观点来解释结果。这表明观察到的对规范和价值观的强调,在一定程度上可以看作是教师之间缺乏精通的专业语言,部分是由于在高等教育文献中着眼于发展一种预先定义的消费道德。基于实证研究结果和理论框架,讨论了如何发展高等师范教育以减少规范和价值转移的意图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号