...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Equality versus fraternity? Rethinking France and its minorities
【24h】

Equality versus fraternity? Rethinking France and its minorities

机译:平等与博爱?重新思考法国及其少数民族

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The relationship between France and its minorities is complex, and often controversial. Traditionally, France has been against minority rights. French authorities have consistently eschewed the use of the term "minorities" and any form of targeted ethnic, religious, or linguistic measures. In practice, this has rendered minorities, along with systemic forms of discrimination, invisible. This article examines the pivotal role of the Constitutional Court in interpreting the principle of equality as a rejection of minority rig/its. It identifies fraternity as a dormant term within the French constitutional architecture, which could be triggered to open a pathway towards minority rights recognition. Examples frotti other jurisdictions, in particular India, illustrate the potential. In conclusion the paper argues that France needs a new interpretative approach, and activating fraternity as a constitutional principle offers the legal means by which this could lie realized.
机译:法国与其少数民族之间的关系是复杂的,而且经常引起争议。传统上,法国一直反对少数群体权利。法国当局一贯避免使用“少数民族”一词,以及任何形式的有针对性的种族,宗教或语言措施。实际上,这使得少数群体以及系统的歧视形式变得不可见。本文探讨了宪法法院在将平等原则解释为对少数派制度的拒绝中的关键作用。它在法国宪法体系中将博爱定为休眠术语,可以触发博爱来打开通往承认少数群体权利的途径。其他司法管辖区(尤其是印度)的例子说明了这种潜力。总而言之,本文认为法国需要一种新的解释方法,而将博爱作为宪政原则的激活提供了实现这一点的法律手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号