首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Subregional courts in Africa: Litigating the hybrid right to free movement of persons
【24h】

Subregional courts in Africa: Litigating the hybrid right to free movement of persons

机译:非洲次区域法院:诉讼人的自由流动的混合权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Human rights attorneys and civil society groups in Africa have recently focused their advocacy efforts on subregional courts associated with economic integration communities in East, West and Southern Africa. The East African Court of Justice, the Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States, and the Tribunal of the Southern African Development Community have received few suits challenging trade restrictions and other barriers to subregional integration. Instead, and surprisingly, the courts' dockets are dominated by complaints alleging violations of international human rights law. This article offers the first analysis of EACJ, ECOWAS Court, and SADC Tribunal decisions concerning the free movement of persons. Freedom of movement is a hybrid legal right. It is protected in the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and in other human rights instruments, but it is also a central pillar of all regional integration systems. Free movement case law thus offers a revealing lens through which to examine how African subregional courts decide which litigants have access to justice, interpret international legal norms, and fashion the remedies awarded to successful complainants.
机译:非洲的人权律师和民间社会团体最近将其倡导工作集中在与东非,西非和南部非洲的经济一体化社区有关的分区域法院。东非法院,西非国家经济共同体法院和南部非洲发展共同体法庭收到的诉讼很少,这些挑战挑战了贸易限制和对次区域一体化的其他障碍。取而代之的是,令人惊讶的是,法院的诉讼被指控违反国际人权法的投诉所占据。本文对东非共同体法院,西非经共体法院和南部非洲发展共同体法庭关于人员自由流动的决定进行了首次分析。迁徙自由是一项混合的法律权利。它在《非洲人权和人民权利宪章》和其他人权文书中得到保护,但它也是所有区域一体化系统的核心支柱。因此,自由流动判例法为揭示非洲次区域法院如何决定哪些诉讼人可以诉诸司法,解释国际法律规范以及制定授予成功申诉人的补救办法提供了一个启示性的视角。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号