首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology >Application of CFPR to fashion design scheme selection
【24h】

Application of CFPR to fashion design scheme selection

机译:CFPR在服装设计方案选择中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to improve the complicated pairwise comparison problem and the consistency of analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the consistent fuzzy preference relation (CFPR) method is applied to select the best fashion design scheme in this study. Design/methodology/approach - The first stage is to review the traditional AHP for fashion design scheme evaluation. The second stage is based on the procedure of CFPR to select the best fashion design scheme. The procedure includes: establishment of the fuzzy preference relation matrix of pairwise comparisons, calculation of criteria weight, and calculation of the evaluation value for ratings of fashion design schemes with respect to criteria. The final stage is to compare the procedures and results between AHP and CFPR for the evaluations of fashion design schemes. Findings - For fashion design scheme selection, there are 76 data for fashion design scheme evaluation in AHP, but only 31 in CFPR. Comparing both AHP and CFPR methods, the rankings of the criteria weight are identical and the priority scores of the fashion design scheme are similar. The CFPR is more efficient than AHP, obviously, to solve the inconsistency of hierarchical decision-making problem. Originality/value - This paper proposes the CFPR method for the selection of the best fashion design scheme. According to the finding of this study, the CFPR is proposed as a practicable option for solving complicated pairwise comparison problems in fashion design decision.
机译:目的-本文的目的是改善复杂的成对比较问题和层次分析法(AHP)的一致性,本研究采用一致的模糊偏好关系(CFPR)方法选择最佳的服装设计方案。设计/方法/方法-第一步是审查传统的AHP,以评估服装设计方案。第二阶段是基于CFPR的程序来选择最佳的服装设计方案。该过程包括:建立成对比较的模糊偏好关系矩阵,计算标准权重,以及计算服装设计方案相对于标准的评估值。最后阶段是比较AHP和CFPR之间的程序和结果,以评估时装设计方案。调查结果-对于服装设计方案的选择,AHP中有76个数据用于服装设计方案评估,而CFPR中只有31个数据。比较AHP和CFPR方法,标准权重的排名是相同的,时装设计方案的优先级分数是相似的。显然,CFPR比AHP更为有效,可以解决层次决策问题的不一致性。创意/价值-本文提出了CFPR方法,以选择最佳的服装设计方案。根据这项研究的发现,提出CFPR作为解决服装设计决策中复杂的成对比较问题的可行选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号