首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Child - Computer Interaction >Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the Computational Thinking Test
【24h】

Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the Computational Thinking Test

机译:可以发现计算人才吗?计算思维测验的预测有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Computational thinking (CT) is arising as a set of problem-solving skills that must be acquired by the new generations of students to fully understand and participate in our computer-based world. However, from a psychometric approach, we are still at an early stage regarding the definition and assessment of CT as a psychological variable. One way to advance in this area is to investigate whether 'computationally talented' students (i.e., 'computational top thinkers') can be detected even before learning to code; and, if so, how to teach them properly to fully develop their high-computational ability. This paper presents several empirical concatenated studies about the predictive validity of the Computational Thinking Test (CTt), which is administered on a sample of 314 middle school Spanish students (n = 314). We report the predictive validity of the CTt, conducted at the beginning of the quarter, with respect to academic performance (Informatics, Mathematics, and Language) and learning analytics in a Code.org course collected at the end of the quarter. We also analyze the predictive validity of the CTt to early distinguish between 'computational regular thinkers' and 'computational top thinkers' (i.e., those who spontaneously accelerated from the 'block-based' programming environment of Code.org to the 'text-based' one of Khan Academy). Finally, we perform a case study over two of the students categorized as 'computational top thinkers', in which one of their coding products written in Processing JavaScript is described. Our results demonstrate that 'computationally talented' students can be detected in middle school, and that these subjects have the ability to accelerate in the Computer Science Education standards between 1 and 2 years compared to the regular learners. This could have major implications on the emerging computing curricula, which should take into account these individual differences in computational ability and 'learning-how-to-code' speed to ensure an appropriate progression for every student.
机译:计算思维(CT)是一系列解决问题的技能,新一代学生必须具备这些能力才能充分理解和参与基于计算机的世界。但是,从心理学的角度来看,我们仍处于将CT作为心理变量的定义和评估的早期阶段。在该领域取得进步的一种方法是研究即使在学习编码之前也能检测到“具有计算能力的”学生(即“计算机顶尖思想家”);如果是的话,以及如何正确地教他们充分发挥其高计算能力。本文介绍了一些关于计算思维测验(CTt)的预测有效性的经验串联研究,该测验是对314名西班牙中学生(n = 314)的样本进行的。我们将在本季度末收集的Code.org课程中报告在本季度初进行的CTt对学术表现(信息学,数学和语言)和学习分析的预测有效性。我们还分析了CTt的预测有效性,以尽早区分“计算常规思想家”和“计算高层思想家”(即那些自发地从Code.org的“基于块的”编程环境发展到“基于文本的”思想家)。 (可汗学院之一)。最后,我们对被归类为“计算最佳思想家”的两名学生进行了案例研究,其中描述了他们用处理JavaScript编写的一种编码产品。我们的研究结果表明,可以在初中发现“具有计算能力的”学生,并且与常规学习者相比,这些学科在1-2年内可以提高计算机科学教育水平。这可能会对新兴的计算机课程产生重大影响,该课程应考虑到计算机能力和“编码学习方法”速度方面的这些个体差异,以确保每个学生都有适当的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号