...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging >Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
【24h】

Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

机译:门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像的比较,用于评估特发性扩张型心肌病患者的左心室容积和射血分数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To prospectively compare the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained from gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) with those obtained from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). Twenty-one patients with IDC (6 females) with a median age of 45 years (range 17–65) were scheduled for 99mTc-tetrofosmin-GSPECT and MRI within a 3 h interval. In both methods LV volumes were analyzed with the Simpson method. Both GSPECT and MRI were successfully completed in 90% of patients. Close linear correlations were observed between the two methods in LVEDV (R = 0.918; P < 0.001) and LVESV (R = 0.946; P < 0.001), but correlations were significantly weaker in LVEF (R = 0.323; P = 0.082). LVEDV and LVESV were smaller in GSPECT than in MRI (161 ± 73 vs. 214 ± 87 ml, P < 0.001, and 116 ± 64 vs. 138 ± 72 ml, P < 0.001, respectively). In 4 patients (21%) the LVEDV index was considered normal by GSPECT and increased by MRI, if MRI-derived normal values were used. No difference was found between GSPECT and MRI when LVEFMRI was ≤40%, but GSPECT showed smaller LVEF when LVEFMRI was over 40% (33 ± 11 vs. 50 ± 5%; P < 0.05). The finding of increased LVEDV in GSPECT is reliable compared with MRI. However, LV volumes were underestimated by GSPECT and no direct comparisons can be made between methods in follow up studies. Abnormal results should be confirmed by another imaging modality, such as MRI, if these findings have therapeutic consequences.
机译:前瞻性比较门控灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(GSPECT)与心脏磁共振成像(MRI)获得的左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV),收缩末期容积(LVESV)和射血分数(LVEF) )患有特发性扩张型心肌病(IDC)的患者。 21名IDC患者(6名女性)中位年龄为45岁(范围17-65),计划在3 h间隔内进行99m Tc-tetrofosmin-GSPECT和MRI检查。在两种方法中,LV体积均使用Simpson方法进行分析。 90%的患者均成功完成了GSPECT和MRI检查。在LVEDV(R = 0.918; P <0.001)和LVESV(R = 0.946; P <0.001)中,两种方法之间观察到了紧密的线性相关性,但LVEF中的相关性明显较弱(R = 0.323; P = 0.082)。 GSPECT中的LVEDV和LVESV小于MRI(分别为161±73和214±87 ml,P <0.001和116±64和138±72 ml,P <0.001)。如果使用MRI得出的正常值,则4例(21%)患者的LVEDV指数被GSPECT认为是正常的,而被MRI升高。 LVEFMRI ≤40%时,GSPECT与MRI无差异,而LVEFMRI 超过40%时,GSPECT显示LVEF较小(33±11 vs. 50±5%; P <0.05)。与MRI相比,在GSPECT中发现LVEDV增加是可靠的。然而,GSPECT低估了左室容积,因此无法在后续研究中对方法进行直接比较。如果这些发现有治疗意义,则应通过其他成像方式(如MRI)确认异常结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号