首页> 外文期刊>International journal of business information systems >Comparing internet financial reporting practices: Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Japan and Australia
【24h】

Comparing internet financial reporting practices: Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Japan and Australia

机译:比较互联网财务报告惯例:印度尼西亚,马来西亚,新加坡,日本和澳大利亚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Internet financial reporting practices in Indonesia is one form of transparency and accountability of good corporate governance. Good corporate governance requires companies to present information timely, clear, and comparable, especially concerning financial issues, management and company ownership. The research objective is to compare the quality of corporate disclosure of internet financial reporting in Indonesia, Singapore, Japan, Malaysia and Australia. The sample in this research is the companies in each country (Malaysia, Singapore, Japan and Australia) are the best in the category of Forbes magazine (Forbes 2000). Indonesia's best to use the criteria established by SWA magazine (SWA 100). The result of this study indicates that there are differences in IFR quality between companies in Malaysia with companies in Australia and Japan. This study also shows that there is a difference in IFR quality between companies in Indonesia with companies in Australia, Singapore and Japan.
机译:印度尼西亚的互联网财务报告惯例是良好公司治理的透明性和问责制的一种形式。良好的公司治理要求公司及时,清晰,可比地提供信息,尤其是有关财务问题,管理和公司所有权的信息。研究目的是比较印尼,新加坡,日本,马来西亚和澳大利亚的互联网财务报告的公司披露质量。该研究的样本是每个国家(马来西亚,新加坡,日本和澳大利亚)在《福布斯》杂志类别中最好的公司(《福布斯》 2000年)。印度尼西亚最好使用SWA杂志(SWA 100)建立的标准。这项研究的结果表明,马来西亚的公司与澳大利亚和日本的公司之间的IFR质量存在差异。这项研究还表明,印尼公司与澳大利亚,新加坡和日本的公司之间的IFR质量存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号