首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of aviation psychology >Difficult Access: The Impact of Recall Steps on Flight Management System Errors
【24h】

Difficult Access: The Impact of Recall Steps on Flight Management System Errors

机译:难以进入:召回步骤对飞行管理系统错误的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines flight management system (FMS) tasks and errors by C-130 pilots who were recently qualified on a newly introduced advanced FMS. Twenty flight tasks supported by the FMS were analyzed using a cognitive stage model (Sherry, Poison, Feary, & Palmer, 2002) to identify steps with the potential for errors. If a step was found not to have visual cues such as labels or prompts for the required action sequence it was identified as a recall step and a potential source of difficulty. If the action was supported by salient labels and prompts it was identified as a recognition step. Actual pilots using an FMS were observed and performance and errors categorized into the related task step. The greatest amount of observed difficulty was accessing the correct function, labeled as an access error. This process was found to be particularly vulnerable to recall problems. Pilots had the likelihood of .74 for committing an access error on tasks with 2 recalled access steps. This is compared to . 13 for 1 recalled access step and .06 for no recalled access steps. Errors associated with formatting, inserting, or verifying entries were less common than access errors; however, these errors primarily occurred on tasks in which recall steps were required for the related step. A total of 93% of the format errors, 80% of the insert errors, and 81 % of the verify errors occurred on the tasks that did not have good recognition support for each associated step. On a positive note, experience with the new FMS in the preceding 6 months was correlated with a decrease in overall errors, r(22) = -.42,p < .05, and a decrease in errors associated with inadequate knowledge to accomplish a required step, r(22)=-.61,p<. 01.
机译:这项研究检查了C-130飞行员的飞行管理系统(FMS)的任务和错误,这些飞行员​​最近获得了新引进的先进FMS的资格。 FMS支持的20个飞行任务使用认知阶段模型进行了分析(Sherry,Poison,Feary和&Palmer,2002年),以识别可能出错的步骤。如果发现某个步骤没有视觉提示,例如标签或提示所需的操作顺序,则将其识别为召回步骤和潜在的困难源。如果操作由显着标签支持并提示,则将其识别为识别步骤。观察了使用FMS的实际飞行员,并将性能和错误归类为相关任务步骤。观察到的最大困难是访问正确的功能,被标记为访问错误。发现此过程特别容易产生召回问题。飞行员在有2个被召回的访问步骤的任务上犯下访问错误的可能性为0.74。与此相比。 13表示1个被调用的访问步骤,.06表示没有被调用的访问步骤。与格式化,插入或验证条目相关的错误比访问错误少见。但是,这些错误主要发生在需要对相关步骤进行召回步骤的任务上。总计93%的格式错误,80%的插入错误和81%的验证错误发生在没有为每个相关步骤提供良好识别支持的任务上。积极的一点是,前6个月使用新FMS的经验与总体错误的减少相关,r(22)= -.42,p <.05,以及与知识不足有关的错误的减少与完成相关。所需步骤r(22)=-。61,p <。 01。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号