首页> 外文期刊>International journal of ambient energy >Comparative thermodynamic analysis of compact cogeneration and triple-effect refrigeration cycles
【24h】

Comparative thermodynamic analysis of compact cogeneration and triple-effect refrigeration cycles

机译:紧凑型热电联产和三效制冷循环的比较热力学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 'compact cogeneration cycle' and the 'compact power and triple-effect refrigeration cycle' have been compared and analysed on the basis of energy and exergy approaches under the same operating conditions. The exergy analysis of both the above cycles leads to a possible performance improvement. The cogeneration cycle has less 'exergy destruction' due to irreversibilities in the different components, 'exergy and energy lost' to the environment than that of the 'triple-effect refrigeration cycle', while the total useful exergy and energy outputs of the cogeneration cycle are greater. The used refrigerants and exhaust gas emissions samples of both cycles are more favourable than the fossil fuel-run engine for reducing the global environment-related problems. The calculation results also show that the associated cycles with the cogeneration cycle have significant higher effect on the exergy and energy efficiencies than that of the 'compact power and triple-effect refrigeration cycle'.
机译:在相同的运行条件下,基于能量和火用方法,对“紧凑型热电联产循环”和“紧凑型功率三重制冷循环”进行了比较和分析。以上两个循环的火用分析可能会改善性能。与不同的“三效制冷循环”相比,热电联产循环由于不同组成部分的不可逆性,“对环境的热能和能量损失”而导致的“火能破坏”更少,而热电联产循环的总有用火能和能量输出更大。两个循环使用的制冷剂和废气排放样品比化石燃料运行的发动机更有利于减少与全球环境相关的问题。计算结果还表明,与热电联产循环相关的循环对火用和能源效率的影响要比“紧凑型功率和三效制冷循环”高得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号