【24h】

Knowledge in Networks: Knowing in Transactions?

机译:网络知识:在交易中知道吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper discusses a methodological dilemma proposed by engaging actor-network theory (ANT) in studying collaborative research practices of researchers in a large interdisciplinary project. The paper sets the context of this largepublicallyfundedproject ('Ensemble: Semantic Technologies for the Enhancement of Case Based learning') between Education and Computer Sciences, currently being undertaken by a consortium of six UK universities and three international partners. While a strand of ANT states that knowledge 'emerges as continuously generated effects of webs of relations within which they are located' (Law 2007), it is very vague in terms of how precisely does that knowledge emerge and how to study that. The methods -question was further complicated by the existence of multiple, potentially conflicting epistemological positions present at the project - how to study these without having to pass a value judgement in terms of their validity and reliability? The specific focus of the discussion is what might be termed the epistemology of actor-network theory, with particular consideration of the Principle of Symmetry. The paper suggests reading ANT through John Dewey's Pragmatism and assesses ideas to take forward from this discussion in order to study interdis ciplinary research work.
机译:本文讨论了一个参与者网络理论(ANT)在研究大型跨学科项目中研究人员的协作研究实践时所提出的方法论难题。这篇论文为教育和计算机科学之间的这个大型的公共资助项目(“合奏:用于基于案例的学习的语义技术”)设定了背景,该项目目前由英国六所大学和三个国际合作伙伴组成的财团进行。一小撮ANT指出,知识“是作为它们所处的关系网不断产生的影响而出现的”(法律2007年),但就知识的精确产生和学习方式而言,这是非常模糊的。由于存在多个,可能相互冲突的认识论立场,项目使方法变得更加复杂。如何在不通过有效性和可靠性进行价值判断的情况下研究这些问题?讨论的重点是所谓的行为者网络理论的认识论,特别要考虑对称性原理。该论文建议通过约翰·杜威的实用主义来阅读《蚂蚁》,并评估从这一讨论中可以借鉴的观点,以便研究跨学科的研究工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号