首页> 外文期刊>International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics >Sustainability labelling as a tool for reporting the sustainable development impacts of climate actions relevant to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement
【24h】

Sustainability labelling as a tool for reporting the sustainable development impacts of climate actions relevant to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement

机译:可持续性标签作为报告与《巴黎协定》第六条有关的气候行动对可持续发展影响的工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The architecture of global carbon markets has changed significantly since the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals were both agreed in 2015. Voluntary, international cooperative approaches established in Article 6 of the Paris Agreement allow Parties to work together to achieve the targets set out in their respective Nationally Determined Contributions to limit global warming to an increase below 1.5-2 degrees C. In Article 6.4, a sustainable mitigation mechanism is established for which rules, modalities and procedures will be developed internationally considering the experience and lessons learned from existing mechanisms, such as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and its Sustainable Development (SD) Tool. Historically the issue of making integrated assessments of sustainable development and mitigation actions has been politically and methodologically controversial for many reasons: developing countries fear that an international definition of SD will interfere with their sovereignty and therefore their ability to define their own development pathways; players in the carbon market fear that markets can only handle one objective, namely mitigation outcomes; and sustainable development is regarded as too complex and costly to be measured and quantified. In an effort to address these concerns, the article proposes a new methodology for the sustainability labelling of climate mitigation actions relevant to Article 6 approaches. The article draws on an application of the CDM SD tool to analyse 2098 Component Programme Activities that had entered the CDM Pipeline by January 2017. The article demonstrates that assessment of the sustainable development benefits of climate actions can be graded and labelled based on the analysis of qualitative data, which is less costly than applying a quantitative approach.
机译:自2015年达成《巴黎协定》和《 2030年可持续发展目标议程》以来,全球碳市场的架构发生了重大变化。《巴黎协定》第6条确立的自愿性国际合作方式使缔约方能够共同努力以实现既定目标各自的国家自主贡献,以将全球变暖限制在1.5-2摄氏度以下。在第6.4条中,建立了可持续的缓解机制,将在国际上制定规则,方式和程序,并借鉴现有经验和教训机制,例如清洁发展机制(CDM)及其可持续发展(SD)工具。从历史上看,对可持续发展和减缓行动进行综合评估的问题在政治和方法上一直存在诸多争议,原因有很多:发展中国家担心可持续发展的国际定义会干扰其主权,从而影响其确定自己的发展道路的能力;碳市场的参与者担心市场只能处理一个目标,即缓解结果。可持续发展被认为过于复杂,成本高昂,无法衡量和量化。为了解决这些问题,本文提出了一种新的方法,用于对与第6条方法有关的气候减缓行动进行可持续性标签。本文利用CDM SD工具来分析截至2017年1月已进入CDM管道的2098个组成部分计划活动。该文章证明,可以基于对气候行动的分析来对气候行动的可持续发展利益进行评估和标记。定性数据,其成本低于采用定量方法的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号