首页> 外文期刊>International association of theoretical and applied limnoloy >Comparison of two methods for estimating sedimentation in shallow lakes
【24h】

Comparison of two methods for estimating sedimentation in shallow lakes

机译:两种浅湖沉积估算方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The most widespread method to measure sedimentation in surface waters is sediment trapping (HORN & HORN 1990). The physical outline, dimensions and mode of suspension vary greatly, making methods of sedimentation measurement difficult (BLOMQVIST & HAKANSON 1981). Sediment traps were originally used to measure settling flux of organic matter in deep lakes. Later the method was applied in shallow lakes (KOZERSKI 1994); however, in shallow lakes most of the settling matter is the resuspended sediment (EVANS 1994). Several methods can differentiate between net sedimentation and sedimentation after resuspension, but none yield satisfactory results (KOZERSKI & KLEE-BERG 1998). This problem prevails in Lake Balaton, Hungary, due to the large surface (592 km~2) to depth (average 3.2m) ratio and to the long fetch, which results in frequent resuspension events. Another method, high frequency online registration of suspended solids concentration of the water, allows estimating net sedimentation. The aim of the present study is to compare this method with sediment trapping.
机译:测量地表水中沉降的最普遍方法是沉积物捕集(HORN&HORN 1990)。悬浮物的物理外形,尺寸和模式相差很大,使得沉淀法的测量变得困难(BLOMQVIST&HAKANSON 1981)。沉积物收集器最初用于测量深湖中有机物的沉降通量。后来,该方法被应用到浅水湖泊中(KOZERSKI 1994)。然而,在浅水湖泊中,大部分沉降物是重悬的沉积物(EVANS 1994)。有几种方法可以区分净沉降和重悬浮后的沉降,但没有一种方法可以令人满意(KOZERSKI&KLEE-BERG 1998)。这个问题在匈牙利的巴拉顿湖普遍存在,这是由于大的地表(592 km〜2)与深度(平均3.2m)的比值和较长的取料时间,导致频繁的重悬事件。另一种方法是通过高频在线记录水中悬浮物的浓度,从而可以估算出净沉降量。本研究的目的是将这种方法与沉积物捕集进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号