首页> 外文期刊>International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnoloy. Part 1, Verhandlungen, Proceedings, Travaux >Forest structure and stream salamander diets: Implications for terrestrial-aquatic connectivity
【24h】

Forest structure and stream salamander diets: Implications for terrestrial-aquatic connectivity

机译:森林结构和河流sal饮食:对陆地-水生生物连通性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concept of the ecological boundary is emerging as a useful tool for investigating and understanding ecological processes in heterogeneous landscapes (Cadenasso et al. 2003). Ecosystem ecologists have provided valuable perspectives on the behavior of ecological boundaries, elucidating the regulation of boundary permeability and its implications for energy and nutrient cycles within contiguous patches of different habitat types (Bormann & Likens 1979, Hedin et al. 1998). These boundary-mediated fluxes and direct effects of ecological boundaries on the distribution and dispersal of organisms (e.g., Haddad 1999) can strongly influence emergent properties of natural systems, including resource dynamics (Jef-feries 2000), secondary productivity (Polis & Hurd 1996), and food web composition and stability (Hux-el & McCann 1998). The ecological boundary between aquatic and terrestrial habitats exerts fundamental control on headwater stream systems, where both ecosystem processes and food webs of terrestrial and stream habitats are widely viewed as coupled (Ross 1963, Wallace et al. 1997). The structure and composition of terrestrial vegetation influence the transfer of dissolved substances to the stream (e.g., Likens & Bormann 1995) and regulate in-stream processing of these substances by affecting light, temperature, and hydrologic regimes (Hill et al. 2001, Valett et al. 2002). Species inhabiting headwater systems rely on the flow of resources from terrestrial to stream habitats (Wallace et al. 1997, Nakano et al. 1999b), stream to terrestrial habitats (Helfield & Naiman 2001, Sabo & Power 2002), and reciprocal flows between these two habitats (Nakano & Murakami 2001). Research is limited on how terrestrial-aquatic connectivity in headwater food webs responds to natural variation in terrestrial vegetation conditions, and the research that has been done focuses on stream fish (Wipfli 1997, Allan et al. 2003). Broader un-derstanding in this area will create valuable opportunities to bridge ecosystem- and community-oriented research in stream systems, and to elucidate more fully the implications of well-established patterns of forest succession (e.g., Yoda et al. 1963, Schwarz et al. 2001). This understanding of how riparian forest vegetation affects terrestrial-aquatic links may also be important for forest management that aims to preserve natural ecosystem processes.
机译:生态边界的概念正在成为一种有用的工具,用于研究和理解异质景观中的生态过程(Cadenasso等,2003)。生态系统生态学家为生态边界的行为提供了宝贵的见解,阐明了边界渗透性的调节及其对不同生境类型的连续斑块内能量和养分循环的影响(Bormann&Likens 1979,Hedin et al。1998)。这些边界介导的通量和生态边界对生物分布和扩散的直接影响(例如,Haddad 1999)可以强烈影响自然系统的新兴特性,包括资源动力学(Jef-feries 2000),次要生产力(Polis&Hurd 1996)。 ),食物网的组成和稳定性(Hux-el&McCann 1998)。水生和陆地生境之间的生态边界对源头水流系统施加了基本控制,在生态系统过程中,陆地和河流生境的生态系统过程和食物网被广泛认为是耦合的(Ross 1963,Wallace等人,1997)。陆地植被的结构和组成影响溶解物质向河流的转移(例如,Likens&Bormann 1995),并通过影响光照,温度和水文状况来调节这些物质在河流中的处理(Hill等,2001; Valett)。等(2002)。栖息于源头水系的物种依赖于从陆地生境到河流生境的资源流动(Wallace等,1997; Nakano等人,1999b);流向陆地生境的资源流动(Helfield&Naiman,2001; Sabo&Power,2002),以及它们之间的相互流动两个生境(Nakano和Murakami 2001)。关于源头食物网中的陆-水连通性如何响应陆生植被条件的自然变化的研究是有限的,并且已经完成的研究集中在溪流鱼类上(Wipfli 1997,Allan et al。2003)。在这一领域更广泛的了解将创造宝贵的机会,在河流系统中架起以生态系统和社区为导向的研究的桥梁,并更充分地阐明已建立的森林演替模式的含义(例如,Yoda等人,1963年,Schwarz等人, (2001)。对河岸森林植被如何影响陆地-水生联系的这种理解对于旨在保护自然生态系统过程的森林管理也可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号