...
首页> 外文期刊>International Affairs >Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US-China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond
【24h】

Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US-China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond

机译:了解印度太平洋的动态:中美战略竞争,区域参与者及其他

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a geographical concept, 'Indo-Pacific' has existed for decades. As a political and strategic concept, it has since 2010 gradually become established in the foreign policy lexicon of some countries, especially Australia, India, Japan and the United States. However, China seems to be reluctant to identify itself as part of the Indo-Pacific; Chinese leaders believe that the US-led Indo-Pacific strategy aims to contain China's rise. While the battle between the two geographical concepts 'Indo-Pacific' and Asia—Pacific' may be fairly easily settled in the future, US-China strategic competition has just begun. Will the Indo-Pacific become a battlefield for US—China rivalry? How will China cope with the US 'free and open Indo-Pacific' (FOIP) strategy? How will other regional actors respond to the US-China strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific? What are the strategic implications of the 'Indo-Pacific' concept for regional order transformation? How will the Indo-Pacific be institutionalized, economically, politically and strategically? This article introduces the January 2020 special issue of International Affairs, which aims to address those questions, using both country-specific and regional perspectives. Seven articles focus on the policy responses of major players (Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan and ASEAN) to the US FOIP strategy and related US—China rivalry in the region. A further three articles examine the profound implications of Indo-Pacific dynamics for regional institution-building and for geopolitical and geo-economic architecture.
机译:作为一个地理概念,“印度太平洋”已经存在了数十年。作为一种政治和战略概念,自2010年以来,它已逐渐在某些国家(尤其是澳大利亚,印度,日本和美国)的外交政策词典中确立。但是,中国似乎不愿意将自己确定为印度太平洋的一部分。中国领导人认为,美国主导的印度太平洋战略旨在遏制中国的崛起。虽然将来可能很容易解决两个地理概念“印度太平洋”和“亚太”之间的争斗,但中美战略竞争才刚刚开始。印度太平洋会成为美中竞争的战场吗?中国将如何应对美国的“自由开放的印度太平洋”(FOIP)战略?其他地区性参与者将如何应对中印在太平洋地区的战略竞争? “印度太平洋”概念对区域秩序转变的战略意义是什么?印度太平洋将如何在经济,政治和战略上制度化?本文介绍了2020年1月期《国际事务》特刊,旨在利用针对特定国家和地区的观点来解决这些问题。七篇文章重点讨论了主要参与者(澳大利亚,中国,印度,印度尼西亚,日本和东盟)对美国FOIP战略以及该地区相关的中美竞争的政策反应。另有三篇文章探讨了印度太平洋动力学对区域机构建设以及地缘政治和地缘经济体系的深刻影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《International Affairs》 |2020年第1期|a2-a3a51-7|共10页
  • 作者

    KAI HE; MINGJIANG LI;

  • 作者单位

    International Relations in Griffith Asia Institute and Centre for Governance and Public Policy at Griffith University;

    S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) Nanyang Technological University Singapore;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号