【24h】

Management of cancer pain

机译:癌症疼痛的治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the last decades, studies validating the WHO analgesic ladder have been shown to have methodological limitations and different problems are unresolved due to a lack of controlled studies on this subject. These problems include a better definition of the role of NSAIDs, the prolonged use of NSAIDs in cancer pain, and the utility of step 2. Moreover, the indications for using different strong opioids and alternate routes of administration to improve pain relief in difficult pain situations are not well established. The proportion of patients who do not benefit from these treatments remain unclear, and how the opioid response may be improved with the use of adjuvants is also uncertain. This review will offer an update on these problems and the existing therapeutic opportunities.
机译:在过去的几十年中,已证明验证WHO镇痛阶梯的研究存在方法学局限性,并且由于缺乏对此主题的对照研究而未能解决各种问题。这些问题包括更好地定义非甾体抗炎药的作用,在癌症疼痛中长期使用非甾体抗炎药以及步骤2的实用性。此外,在困难的疼痛情况下使用不同的强阿片类药物和替代给药途径改善疼痛的适应症尚未建立。尚不清楚不能从这些治疗中受益的患者比例,并且还不确定如何通过使用佐剂改善阿片样物质的反应。这篇综述将提供有关这些问题和现有治疗机会的最新信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号