首页> 外文期刊>Interiors: design, architecture and culture >Tactical interiority; Hong Kong's 'lived' interiors as praxis for tactical living in High-Density landscapes
【24h】

Tactical interiority; Hong Kong's 'lived' interiors as praxis for tactical living in High-Density landscapes

机译:战术内部性;

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Within Hong Kong's neoliberal landscape, what insights can an interrogation of its domestic interior deliver in terms of spatial and tactical adaptability in the context of volumetrically compressed living? As an urban necessity, dwelling has globally become a malleable urban resource, part and parcel of speculative development far beyond the control of the individual (Levin and Wright 1997; UNECE 2016). Demonstrative of planning and social policy, housing standards have become socio-spatial registers (Marshall 1950), that at the larger scale essentially expose misread criteria that affect social mobility and the "well-being" of all citizens (Morris 1961). However, beyond the structural issues lies a "lived" reality. The need for equal housing (Yung and Lee 2014), and the rising criticism of public housing's punitive point system (Yau 2012), has forced the "practice" of dwelling to become a "tactical" environment. In view of Hong Kong's spatial recoil, this paper commences from a position that sees compressed interiors as a mirror for social needs. First, the investigation of interiors questions how space is tactically mechanized -how and by what means - against compressed living that maximizes moments of "micro-resistance." Second, in an ethnographic sense, it posits the square-foot-society concept, that triangulates the conditions of quotidian everyday-ness with the spatial technical affordances that become specific to groups, peoples, and cultures with their customs and habits. As a conclusion the paper harnesses the "tactical" to formulate alternatives to challenge planning attitudes that view compression as a natural consequence of sustainability and at the larger scale of Hong Kong's approach to Urbanization.
机译:在香港的新自由主义景观中,在空间压缩的生活背景下,对空间内部和战术适应性的质疑可以提供哪些见解?作为城市的必需品,住房已成为全球可延展的城市资源,是投机性发展的重要组成部分,远远超出了个人的控制范围(Levin and Wright 1997; UNECE 2016)。为了说明计划和社会政策,住房标准已成为社会空间登记册(Marshall,1950年),从更大的范围来看,住房标准实质上暴露了影响社会流动性和全体公民“福祉”的误读标准(Morris 1961)。但是,除了结构性问题之外,还存在着“有生命的”现实。对平等住房的需求(Yung和Lee,2014年),以及对公共住房惩罚性积分制度的日益批评(Yau,2012年),已迫使住房的“实践”成为“战术”环境。考虑到香港在空间上的后坐力,本文从这样一个角度出发:将压缩的内部视作社会需求的一面镜子。首先,对室内装饰的研究提出了如何在空间上从战术上机械化-如何以及通过何种方式-对抗最大化“微阻力”时刻的压缩生活。其次,从人种学的角度出发,它提出了平方英尺社会的概念,该概念将“日常生活”的条件与特定于群体,民族和文化以及其习俗和习惯的空间技术能力进行了三角划分。作为结论,本文利用“战术”来提出替代方案,以挑战规划态度,这些观点认为压缩是可持续性的自然结果,并且是香港大规模城市化方法的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号