首页> 外文期刊>Inter-Asia Cultural Studies >Shifting spaces, frozen frames: trajectories of queer politics in contemporary India
【24h】

Shifting spaces, frozen frames: trajectories of queer politics in contemporary India

机译:转移空间,冻结框架:当代印度的酷儿政治轨迹

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper is a comparative reading of two Malayalam films The Journey (Sancharram, 2004) and The Wandering Bird Does Not Cry (Deshadana Kili Karayarilla, 1986) as representative of differing trajectories of queer politics in the Kerala public sphere. It uses an analysis of the representative strategies of these two films, to interrogate the limits of a universal language of sexual identity politics. The paper places the two films in the different historical contexts in which they are produced, and deploys a film from an earlier time period to problematize some of the assumptions of contemporary queer politics. For this purpose it undertakes a close reading of the cinematic codes of both these films, especially the spatial arrangements in the films. I argue that the location of Sancharram in the LGBT discourse in India and abroad makes it so enmeshed in setting up an established meaning for the term 'queer' that the process of queering becomes one of stabilizing a chosen form of desire as the ideal one. In this process of setting up a stable trajectory for queer desire, it also freezes the spatial and social terrains of Kerala. The process of queering that Deshadana Kili Karayarilla undertakes is not one that attempts to set up a particular subject position as the queer subject position. It sets out to trouble the naturalized construction of the heterosexual couple and injects a sense of instability into the social sphere itself. The paper examines how some of the taken-for-granted assumptions of transnational queer politics, like the celebration of visible bodies, gets radically questioned when we turn to non-metropolitan sites of analysis. It aims to look at how cultural texts can embody different modes of sexual politics, as activists struggle to coin strategies to articulate the political possibilities of non-normative sexual practices in Kerala today.
机译:本文是对马拉雅拉姆语两部电影《旅途》(Sancharram,2004年)和《流浪的鸟不哭》(Deshadana Kili Karayarilla,1986年)的比较读物,它们代表了喀拉拉邦公共领域酷儿政治的不同轨迹。它使用对这两部电影的代表性策略的分析,来审视性认同政治的通用语言的局限性。该论文将这两部电影置于其制作的不同历史背景中,并部署了较早时期的一部电影,以质疑当代酷儿政治的某些假设。为此,它仔细阅读这两部电影的电影代码,尤其是电影中的空间安排。我认为Sancharram在印度和国外的LGBT话语中所处的位置使其陷入为“酷儿”一词确立既定含义的过程,以至于酷儿的过程成为稳定一种理想的欲望形式的一种。在建立满足酷儿愿望的稳定轨迹的过程中,它还冻结了喀拉拉邦的空间和社会地形。 Deshadana Kili Karayarilla进行的酷炫过程不是试图将特定主题位置设置为酷炫主题位置的过程。它开始给异性恋夫妇的自然化建造带来麻烦,并将不稳定感注入社会领域本身。本文探讨了当我们转向非大都市的分析场所时,如何对跨国酷儿政治的一些理所当然的假设(如庆祝有形物体)进行彻底质疑。它旨在研究文化文本如何体现不同的性政治模式,因为激进主义者努力制定策略以阐明当今喀拉拉邦非规范性行为的政治可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号