首页> 外文期刊>Intelligence and National Security >Problems in the Intelligence-Policy Nexus: Rethinking Korea, Tet, and Afghanistan
【24h】

Problems in the Intelligence-Policy Nexus: Rethinking Korea, Tet, and Afghanistan

机译:情报政策联结中的问题:对韩国,春节和阿富汗的重新思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Accusations of failure by elements of the US intelligence community (IC) have followed in the wake of nearly every war and terrorist bombing since Japan's successful strike on Pearl Harbor in 1941. This article will illustrate how some problems that exist inside the 'intelligence-policy nexus' are beyond the control of the IC. By investigating the dynamics and tensions that exist between producers of intelligence (the IC) and the consumers of those products (policy-makers), we review three different types of alleged failure. First, by revisiting the Chinese intervention in Korea, we show that a rarely listed case in the literature is in fact a classic example of producer-based failure generated from within the IC. However, in our study of the Tet Offensive during the Vietnam War (1968), we show that the alleged intelligence failure by producers should be more accurately described as a 'failure of intelligence' by consumers. Third, by revisiting the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (1979), we conclude that there existed neither a producer nor a consumer failure. The Carter Administration made a conscious policy choice to act surprised (when it was not).
机译:自从1941年日本成功袭击珍珠港以来,几乎每场战争和恐怖袭击都伴随着美国情报界(IC)分子对失败的指责。本文将说明“情报政策”内部如何存在一些问题。关联”超出了IC的控制范围。通过调查情报生产者(IC)和这些产品的消费者(政策制定者)​​之间存在的动态和紧张关系,我们回顾了三种不同类型的所谓故障。首先,通过回顾中国对朝鲜的干预,我们发现文献中很少列出的案例实际上是IC内部产生基于生产者的失败的经典示例。但是,在我们对越南战争(1968年)中的“春节攻势”的研究中,我们表明,生产者所谓的情报失灵应该更准确地描述为消费者的“情报失灵”。第三,通过回顾苏联对阿富汗的入侵(1979年),我们得出结论,既没有生产者失败也没有消费者失败。卡特政府做出了有意识的政策选择,使之措手不及(如果不是这样)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号