...
【24h】

CASE HIGHLIGHTS

机译:案例要点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The patent exhaustion doctrine barred a patentee's infringement claims against two manufacturers of mobile devices, insofar as those claims arose after patentee entered into licensing agreement with its licensee. Pursuant to that agreement, the licensee was authorized to convey to the manufacturers an operating system that practiced the licensed patent for a method and apparatus for preserving precise exceptions in binary translated code, which it did. Also, this operating system substantially embodied the patented method and apparatus and it had no reasonable, noninfringing uses, since users had the ability to enable a different component within that system, but making that change created a risk of breaking the system's implementations and third-party applications. See Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2014 WL 4553226 (N.D. Ill. 2014).
机译:专利权穷竭原则禁止专利权人对两家移动设备制造商的侵权要求,只要这些权利要求是在专利权人与其被许可人订立许可协议之后提出的。根据该协议,被许可方被授权向制造商传达一种操作系统,该操作系统实践了许可的专利,该方法和设备将二进制翻译后的代码中的精确异常保存下来。同样,该操作系统实质上体现了获得专利的方法和设备,并且没有合理的,非侵权的用途,因为用户有能力在该系统中启用其他组件,但是进行此更改会造成破坏该系统的实现方式和第三种风险。派对申请。参见Cascades Computer Innovation,LLC诉Samsung Electronics Co.Ltd。,2014 WL 4553226(N.D. Ill.2014)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Intellectual property counselor 》 |2014年第216期| 27-29| 共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号