首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Plaintiff Sent Back to District Court for $660 Million (or More) Reduction in Damages Award in Trade Secrets Case
【24h】

Plaintiff Sent Back to District Court for $660 Million (or More) Reduction in Damages Award in Trade Secrets Case

机译:原告送回地区法院,以6.6亿美元(或更多)减少商业秘密案件的损害赔偿案件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Epic Systems Corp. v. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently dealt a blow to plaintiffs in trade secrets cases, vacating a jury verdict totaling $1.04 billion and remanding the case to the district court with instructions not to exceed $280 million in damages.1 According to the complaint, Tata Consultancy Services ("TCS") downloaded thousands of documents containing Epic's trade secrets, using an old user access account to an Epic internal testing and support system that had not been purged. Epic repeatedly turned down a client's requests that TCS be able to access to the system. Using this old account, TCS accessed Epic's confidential information to compile a spreadsheet comparing its products to Epic's, which it used to develop and market its own software products to clients, including Epic clients. Epic sued in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin asserting multiple causes of action, including breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair competition, deprivation of property, and unjust enrichment.
机译:在EPIC Systems v.Tata咨询服务有限公司中,美国第七次巡回赛的上诉法院最近在商业秘密案件中对原告进行了打击,腾出了陪审团裁决总额为120.4亿美元,并用指示向地区法院撤销根据投诉,塔塔咨询服务(“TCS”)不超过2.8亿美元的损害赔偿金,使用旧用户访问账户向史诗内部测试和支持系统的史诗内部测试和支持系统下载了数千个包含史诗的商业秘密的文件。 EPIC反复拒绝客户的请求,即TCS能够访问该系统。使用这个旧帐户,TCS访问了ePIC的机密信息,编译了将其产品与Epic的电子表格进行比较,它用于向客户开发和销售自己的软件产品,包括史诗客户,包括史诗客户。史诗起诉在美国地区法院威斯康星州西区宣传了多种行动原因,包括违反合同,欺诈性虚假陈述,挪用商业秘密,不公平竞争,剥夺财产和不公正的富集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号