...
首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Supreme Court Holds That Broad Covenants Not to Sue Divest District Courts of Jurisdiction to Hear Counterclaims for Trademark Invalidity
【24h】

Supreme Court Holds That Broad Covenants Not to Sue Divest District Courts of Jurisdiction to Hear Counterclaims for Trademark Invalidity

机译:最高法院裁定,广泛的盟约不要起诉分散的地区法院对商标无效宣告反诉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The U.S. Supreme Court has held that a sufficiently broad covenant not to sue can divest a federal court's jurisdiction to hear trademark invalidity counterclaims. In Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc., the Court held that a covenant not to sue issued by the plaintiff, Nike, Inc., after it filed suit against the defendant, Already, LLC, mooted Already's counterclaim to cancel Nike's mark. We believe the Supreme Court's holding will have relatively limited significance in trademark or patent litigation because of the unique fact pattern of the case. Nevertheless, the decision provides some guidance to intellectual property owners on how to terminate litigation, including invalidity counterclaims, if discovery reveals that the facts of a case are not what the IP owner understood them to be at the time of filing.
机译:美国最高法院裁定,不提起诉讼的足够广泛的盟约可以剥夺联邦法院的管辖权,以审理商标无效诉讼。在Already,LLC诉Nike,Inc.一案中,法院裁定,原告Nike,Inc.在对被告Already,LLC提起诉讼后,未提起诉讼,提起了Already要求撤销耐克商标的反诉。我们认为,由于案件的独特事实模式,最高法院在商标或专利诉讼中的控股权将具有相对有限的意义。尽管如此,如果发现发现案件事实与知识产权所有人在提出申请时的理解不符,该决定为知识产权所有人提供了一些有关如何终止诉讼的指南,包括无效反诉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号