首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >Fourth Circuit Holds that Trademark Applicant Who Files De Novo District Court Action Challenging Denial of Registration Must Pay PTO's Legal Fees Even if Applicant Succeeds
【24h】

Fourth Circuit Holds that Trademark Applicant Who Files De Novo District Court Action Challenging Denial of Registration Must Pay PTO's Legal Fees Even if Applicant Succeeds

机译:第四巡回法庭裁定,提出新的地区法院诉讼质疑拒绝注册的商标申请人必须支付PTO的律师费,即使申请人成功

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Given that the PTO is located in Virginia and that the court denied rehearing en banc, the Fourth Circuit's ruling is likely to govern many de novo actions filed by losing trademark (or patent) applicants. In deciding whether to seek de novo review in district court or to appeal directly to the Federal Circuit, an unsuccessful applicant will have to balance the cost of an attorneys' fee award against the benefit of expanding the record with discovery and additional factual submissions and de novo review. To keep its options open, an applicant should consider making a more fulsome record in the TTAB instead of waiting for a district court action where it would be liable for a fee award. Finally, it should be noted that the statute does not apply to a de novo action challenging a TTAB ruling in an opposition proceeding (where the PTO is only a party if it intervenes).
机译:鉴于专利商标局位于弗吉尼亚州,并且法院拒绝进行庭外重审,第四巡回法院的裁决很可能会管辖因失去商标(或专利)申请人而提出的许多新诉讼。在决定是要在地区法院进行从头审查还是直接向联邦巡回上诉时,不成功的申请人将不得不权衡律师费裁决的费用与扩大记录与发现以及其他事实陈述和争议之间的利益。新评论。为了保持选择余地,申请人应考虑在TTAB中进行更详尽的记录,而不是等待可能会收取费用的地方法院诉讼。最后,应该指出的是,该法规不适用于对异议程序中TTAB裁决提出异议的从头诉讼(PTO仅在进行干预时才是当事方)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号