...
首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual property & technology law journal >The Federal Circuit Redefines Secondary Meaning and Infringement for Product Trade Dress in Converse
【24h】

The Federal Circuit Redefines Secondary Meaning and Infringement for Product Trade Dress in Converse

机译:相反,联邦巡回法院重新定义了产品商业外观的次要含义和侵权规定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Whether a trademark owner's mark has acquired secondary meaning is an important question litigated in many cases involving trademark validity. The Federal Circuit's Converse opinion created a new test "for secondary meaning and placed limits on trade dress infringement. The Federal Circuit opinion found registered trade dress carries a presumption of secondary meaning only prospectively from the date of registration. Prior to the date of registration, the mark owner must show acquired secondary meaning prior to the first infringing use for each accused infringer. The Federal Circuit articulated a limitation on product trade dress infringement, claiming product design trade dress can only infringe if it is substantially similar to the protected trade dress, which arguably deviates from the likelihood of confusion standard set forth by other courts.
机译:在许多涉及商标有效性的案件中,商标所有人的商标是否具有次要含义是一个重要的问题。联邦巡回法院的逆向意见为次要含义创建了新的检验标准,并限制了商业外观侵权。联邦巡回法院的意见认为,已注册的商业外观仅从注册之日起才具有次要含义。 ,商标所有人必须在对每个被指控的侵权者进行第一次侵权使用之前,先显示获得的次要含义。联邦巡回法院明确规定了对商品外观设计侵权的限制,声称产品外观设计外观设计只有在与受保护的外观设计实质相似的情况下才能侵权,这有可能偏离其他法院制定的混淆标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号