...
首页> 外文期刊>Insurance >Pension risk management with funding and buyout options
【24h】

Pension risk management with funding and buyout options

机译:养老金风险管理,包括资金和收购选项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been a surge of interest in recent years from defined benefit pension plan sponsors in de-risking their plans with strategies such as "longevity hedges" and "pension buyouts" (Lin et al., 2015). While buyouts are attractive in terms of value creation, they are capital intensive and expensive, particularly for firms with underfunded plans. The existing literature mainly focuses on the costs and benefits of pension buyouts. Little attention has been paid to how to capture the benefits of de-risking within a plan's financial means, especially when buyout deficits are significant. To fill this gap, we propose two options, namely a pension funding option and pension buyout option, that provide financing for both underfunded and well funded plans to cover the buyout risk premium and the pension funding deficit, if a certain threshold is reached. To increase market liquidity, we create a transparent pension funding index, calculated from observed capital market indices and publicly available mortality tables as well as pension mandatory contributions, to determine option payoffs. A simulation based pricing framework is then introduced to determine the prices of the proposed pension options. Our numerical examples show that these options are effective and economically affordable. Moreover, our sensitivity analyses demonstrate the reliability of our pricing models. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:近年来,固定收益养老金计划发起人对使用“长寿对冲”和“养老金买断”等策略降低其计划的风险引起了兴趣(Lin等人,2015)。尽管收购在创造价值方面很有吸引力,但它们是资本密集型且昂贵的,尤其是对于计划资金不足的公司而言。现有文献主要关注养老金收购的成本和收益。很少有人关注如何在计划的财务手段中获取去风险的收益,尤其是在收购赤字很大的情况下。为了填补这一空白,我们提出了两种选择,即养老金资助选项和养老金购买选项,如果达到一定的门槛,则可以为资金不足和资金充足的计划提供资金,以覆盖买断风险溢价和养老金资金赤字。为了增加市场流动性,我们创建了一个透明的养老金筹资指数,该指数是根据观察到的资本市场指数和公开可用的死亡率表以及养老金强制性供款得出的,以确定期权收益。然后引入基于模拟的定价框架,以确定拟议养老金方案的价格。我们的数值示例表明,这些选择是有效的并且在经济上可以承受。此外,我们的敏感性分析证明了我们定价模型的可靠性。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号