首页> 外文期刊>Information today >Privacy or Security?
【24h】

Privacy or Security?

机译:隐私还是安全?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Privacy, data protection, spam, and security are all issues that currently are high on the U.K. and in-ternational agendas, with the daily news challenging the legislation even as it hits the books. In the past few months, two tragic events have shaken the U.K. public and raised the most fundamental questions concerning the rights of free citizens and their security. In December, a murder trial came to an end with the sentencing of Ian Hunt-ley for the deaths of two little girls in Soham, Cambridgeshire. After the verdict was given, it came to light that Huntley had been investigated in the past for several rape allegations in a different part of the country, but that records of the investigations had been deleted by the police. The chief constable later cited the 1998 Data Protection Act as justifying the action. (It should be noted that Huntley was not convicted as a result of any of those investigations.) When the school in Soham that employed him as a janitor requested a standard police check for his appointment, no prior criminal history was revealed nor the fact that he had changed his name (with tragic consequences).
机译:隐私,数据保护,垃圾邮件和安全性目前都是英国和国际议程上的头等大事,每天的新闻都对立法产生了挑战。在过去的几个月中,两次悲惨事件震惊了英国公众,并引发了有关自由公民权利及其安全的最根本的问题。去年12月,谋杀案的审判因伊恩·亨特利(Ian Hunt-ley)因在剑桥郡苏厄姆(Soham)的两个小女孩的死亡而宣判。作出判决后,人们发现亨特利过去曾在该国不同地区被调查过几次强奸指控,但警方已删除了调查记录。首席警官后来引用了1998年的《数据保护法》作为该行动的正当理由。 (应该指出,亨特利没有因任何这些调查而被定罪。)当以聘请他为看门人的苏厄姆学校要求对他的任命进行标准的警察检查时,既没有发现以前的犯罪记录,也没有发现这一事实。他改了名字(带来了悲惨的后果)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号