首页> 外文期刊>Information Systems Research >Don't Mention It? Analyzing User-Generated Content Signals for Early Adverse Event Warnings
【24h】

Don't Mention It? Analyzing User-Generated Content Signals for Early Adverse Event Warnings

机译:不提吗?分析用户生成的内容信号以获取早期不良事件警告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With greater impetus on broad postmarket surveillance, the Voice of the Customer (VoC) has emerged as an important source of information for understanding consumer experiences and identifying potential issues. In organizations, risk management groups are increasingly interested in working with their information technology teams to develop robust VoC listening platforms. Two key challenges have impeded success. First, prior work has leveraged diverse sets of channels, adverse event types, and modeling methods, resulting in diverging conclusions regarding the viability and efficacy of various user-generated channels and accompanying modeling methods. Second, many existing detection methods rely on "mention models" that have low detection rates, have high false positives, and lack timeliness. Following the information systems design science approach, in this research note we propose a framework for examining key design elements for VoC listening platforms. As part of our framework, we also develop a novel heuristic-based method for detecting adverse events. We evaluate our framework and method on two large test beds each encompassing millions of tweets, forums postings, and search query logs pertaining to hundreds of adverse events related to the pharmaceutical and automotive industries. The results shed light on the interplay between user-generated channels and event types, as well as the potential for more robust event modeling methods that go beyond basic mention models. Our analysis framework reveals that user-generated content channels can facilitate timelier detection of adverse events: on average, two to three years or earlier than commonly used databases. The inclusion of negative sentiment polarity in the models can further reduce false-positive rates. Additionally, we find social media channels provide higher detection rates but lower precision than do search-based signals. The search and web forum channels are timelier than Twitter. The proposed heuristic-based method attains markedly better results than do existing methods-with earlier detection rates of 50%-80% and far fewer false positives across an array of VoC channels and event types. The heuristic method is also well suited for signal fusion across channels. Our note makes several contributions to research. The results also have important implications for various practitioner groups, including regulatory agencies and risk management teams at product manufacturing firms.
机译:随着广泛的售后监控的推动,“客户之声”(VoC)已成为理解消费者体验和识别潜在问题的重要信息来源。在组织中,风险管理团队对与他们的信息技术团队合作开发强大的VoC侦听平台越来越感兴趣。两个关键挑战阻碍了成功。首先,先前的工作利用了各种渠道,不良事件类型和建模方法,导致关于各种用户生成的渠道以及随附的建模方法的可行性和有效性的不同结论。其次,许多现有的检测方法都依赖于“提及模型”,该模型具有较低的检测率,较高的假阳性率和缺乏及时性。遵循信息系统设计科学方法,在本研究报告中,我们提出了一个框架,用于检查VoC侦听平台的关键设计元素。作为我们框架的一部分,我们还开发了一种新颖的基于启发式的方法来检测不良事件。我们在两个大型测试平台上评估我们的框架和方法,每个测试平台包含数百万条推文,论坛帖子和与数百个与制药和汽车行业相关的不良事件有关的搜索查询日志。结果揭示了用户生成的渠道与事件类型之间的相互作用,以及潜在的超越基本提及模型的更强大的事件建模方法。我们的分析框架表明,用户生成的内容渠道可以促进及时发现不良事件:平均比常用数据库提前两到三年或更早。在模型中包含负面情绪极性可以进一步降低假阳性率。此外,我们发现社交媒体渠道比基于搜索的信号提供更高的检测率,但准确性更低。搜索和网络论坛的频道比Twitter更及时。所提出的基于启发式的方法比现有方法具有明显更好的结果-早期检测率为50%-80%,并且在一系列VoC通道和事件类型中的误报率要低得多。启发式方法也非常适合跨通道的信号融合。我们的笔记对研究做出了一些贡献。该结果对各种从业人员群体也都具有重要意义,包括产品制造公司的监管机构和风险管理团队。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号