首页> 外文期刊>Information Communication & Society >Fake news practices in Indonesian newsrooms during and after the Palu earthquake: a hierarchy-of-influences approach
【24h】

Fake news practices in Indonesian newsrooms during and after the Palu earthquake: a hierarchy-of-influences approach

机译:在Palu地震期间和之后印度尼西亚新闻室的假新闻实践:影响阶级的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The viral dissemination of fake news threatens news organizations in Indonesia, with many social media users exhibiting a decrease in their trust of traditional media, as well as limited digital literacy. To investigate fake news during natural disasters, this mixed-methods study examines information patterns and journalistic practices of three news organizations during the 2018 Palu earthquake and tsunami. First, online observations of disaster-related fake news cases on social media provide insights into how fake news was handled by three types of news media. The results show that when fake news concerned factual scientific evidence, news organizations unanimously used the government statements to debunk disinformation. In contrast, political or religious fake news had long lifecycles of polarized debates between pro-government groups and opponents. Using the Hierarchy-of Influences Model, in-depth interviews showed that individual-level journalistic professionalism mattered when tackling fake news reports, with some local practices differing from Western journalism approaches. At the routine level, news professionals treated the government as the authority to debunk controversial, high-risk fake news by presenting news only after official clarifications, while independent media tended to present balanced reports with diverse views. Additionally, interviewees revealed that organizational policies in relation to media types greatly influenced the handling of fake news practices in Indonesian newsrooms.
机译:假新闻的病毒传播威胁着印度尼西亚的新闻组织,许多社交媒体用户展示了他们对传统媒体的信任,以及数码识字的有限。为了在自然灾害期间调查假新闻,这种混合方法研究了2018年Palu地震和海啸期间三个新闻组织的信息模式和新闻法。首先,在社交媒体上有与灾害相关的假新闻案件的在线观察提供了探讨了假新闻如何由三种新闻媒体处理的假新闻。结果表明,当假新闻有关事实科学证据时,新闻机构一致将政府声明与揭露的辩护。相比之下,政治或宗教假新闻在亲政府团体和对手之间的极化辩论的寿命长。利用影响模型的层次结构,深入的访谈表明,在解决假新闻报道时,个人级别的新闻专业精神,一些从西方新闻方法不同的地方做法。在日常级别,新闻专业人士将政府视为揭货争议,高风险的假新闻仅在官方澄清后刊发了新闻,而独立媒体倾向于以不同的意见呈现均衡的报告。此外,受访者透露,与媒体类型有关的组织政策极大地影响了印度尼西亚新闻室的假新闻习俗的处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号