首页> 外文期刊>Information and organization >Affordances for practice
【24h】

Affordances for practice

机译:实践费用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper argues that Gibson's concept of affordance inserts a powerful conceptual lens for the study of sociomateriality as enacted in contemporary organizational practices. Our objective in this paper is to develop a comprehensive view of affordances that builds upon the existing conceptualizations in the psychology, human-computer interaction, sociology and information systems literatures and extend them in three important ways. First, we show that taking an integrative interpretation of affordance as dispositional and relational, rather than the standard unidimensional interpretation, provides a theoretical articulation of how the material and the social influence each other. Second, we propose to broaden the focus from the affordances of technology to the affordances for practice provided jointly by technology and organizing. This means considering social affordances alongside technological affordances. Finally, we argue that the best way to integrate the study of social and technological affordances is not to stretch Gibson's original concept to include the social but rather to complement it with a sociological concept that fits it neatly: Bourdieu's idea of habitus. Our claim is that the concepts of affordance and habitus complement and complete each other. Affordance offers a useful way of thinking about how practice is patterned by the social and physical construction of technology and the material environment and habitus offers a useful way of thinking about how practice is patterned by social and symbolic structures. We describe how affordances and habitus may be used together to provide a theoretical apparatus to study practice as a sociomaterial entanglement, thus adding to the methodological toolkit of scholars embracing a sociomaterial perspectives.
机译:本文认为,吉布森的负担能力概念为当代组织实践中制定的社会物质性研究插入了强大的概念镜头。本文的目的是在心理学,人机交互,社会学和信息系统文献中现有的概念化基础上,发展出一种关于收费的综合观点,并以三种重要方式对其进行扩展。首先,我们表明,将供给作为一种倾向性和关系性的综合解释,而不是标准的一维解释,提供了物质和社会如何相互影响的理论表述。第二,我们建议将重点从技术能力扩展到技术和组织共同提供的实践能力。这意味着要同时考虑社会能力和技术能力。最后,我们认为,整合社会和技术能力研究的最佳方法不是将吉布森的原始概念扩展为包括社会,而是以一种恰如其分的社会学概念对其进行补充:布迪厄的惯性概念。我们的主张是,负担能力和习惯习惯的概念相互补充和完善。 Affordance提供了一种思考如何通过技术的社会和物理构造来模仿实践以及物质环境和习惯的有用途径,惯性提供了一种思考如何通过社会和象征性结构来模仿实践的有用途径。我们描述了如何将馈赠和惯习一起使用,以提供一种理论工具来研究作为社会材料纠缠的实践,从而增加了拥护社会材料观点的学者的方法论工具包。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号