...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Informatica >How to allocate review tasks for robust ranking
【24h】

How to allocate review tasks for robust ranking

机译:如何分配审核任务以实现稳健排名

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the process of reviewing and ranking projects by a group of reviewers, the allocation of the subset of projects to each reviewer has major impact on the robustness of the outcome ranking. We address here this problem where each reviewer is assigned, out of the list of all projects, a subset of up to k projects. Each individual reviewer then ranks and compares all pairs of k projects. The k-allocation problem is to determine an allocation of up to k projects to each reviewer, that lie within the expertise set of the reviewer, so that the resulting union of reviewed projects has certain desirable properties. The k-complete problem is a k-allocation with the property that all pairs of projects have been compared by at least one reviewer. A k-complete allocation is desirable as otherwise there may be projects that were not compared by any reviewer, leading to possible adverse properties in the outcome ranking. When a k-complete allocation cannot be achieved, one might settle for other properties. One basic requirement is that each pair of projects is comparable via a ranking path which is a sequence of pairwise rankings of projects implying a comparison of all pairs on the path. A k-allocation with a ranking path between each pair is the connectivity-k-aloc. Since the robustness of relative comparisons deteriorates with increased length of the ranking path, another goal is that between each pair of projects there will be at least one ranking path that has at most two hops or q hops for fixed values of q. An alternative means for increasing the robustness of the ranking is to use a k-allocation with at least p disjoint ranking paths between each pair. We model all these problems as graph problems. We demonstrate that the CONNECTIVITY-k-aloc problem is polynomially solvable, usingrnmatroid intersection; we prove that the it-complete problem is NP-hard unless k = 2; and we provide approximation algorithms for a related optimization problem. All other variants are shown to be NP-complete for all values of k ≥ 2.
机译:在一组审阅者对项目进行审阅和排名的过程中,将项目子集分配给每个审阅者会对​​结果排名的稳健性产生重大影响。我们在这里解决这个问题,即在所有项目列表中为每个审阅者分配最多k个项目的子集。然后,每个单独的审阅者对k个项目的所有对进行排名和比较。 k分配问题是确定最多k个项目对每个审阅者的分配,这些项目位于审阅者的专业知识范围内,以便所审阅项目的合并结果具有某些理想的属性。 k完全问题是具有至少一个审阅者已比较所有项目对的属性的k分配。最好使用k个完全分配,否则可能会有一些项目没有被任何审阅者比较,从而导致结果排名中可能出现不利影响。当无法完成k个完全分配时,可能会满足于其他属性。一个基本要求是,每对项目都可以通过排序路径进行比较,该排序路径是对项目进行成对排序的序列,这意味着该路径上所有对的比较。在每对之间具有排名路径的k分配是连接性k-aloc。由于相对比较的稳健性随着排名路径长度的增加而降低,因此另一个目标是,在每对项目之间,对于q的固定值,至少会有一个排名路径最多具有两跳或q跳的排名路径。用于提高排名的鲁棒性的另一种方法是使用k分配,每对之间至少有p条不相交的排名路径。我们将所有这些问题建模为图形问题。我们证明了连通性-k-aloc问题是拟线性可交的,可以通过多项式求解。我们证明,除非k = 2,否则完全问题是NP-难问题。并且提供了相关优化问题的近似算法。对于所有k≥2的值,所有其他变体都显示为NP完全的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Acta Informatica》 |2010年第6期|P.325-345|共21页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research and Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, USA;

    rnFaculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, The Technion, 32000 Haifa, Israel;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号