首页> 外文期刊>Industrial relations journal >Free movement, equal treatment and workers' rights: can the European Union solve its trilemma of fundamental principles?
【24h】

Free movement, equal treatment and workers' rights: can the European Union solve its trilemma of fundamental principles?

机译:自由流动,平等待遇和工人权利:欧盟能否解决其基本原则的两难困境?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article analyses the trilemma the EU is facing concerning three fundamental principles on which the Community rests: free movement of services and labour; non-discrimination and equal treatment, and the rights of association and industrial action. With rising cross-border flows of services and (posted) labour after the Eastward enlargement, the conflict between these rights has triggered industrial disputes and judicial strife. In the view of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), highlighted in the Laval Quartet, some principles are more fundamental than others. Tracing the 'dual track' along which European integration has evolved, whereby supranational market integration has been combined with national semi-sovereignty in industrial relations and social policies, our claim is that the supremacy of free movement over basic social rights implied by the ECJ judgments is leading Europe in a politically and socially unsustainable direction. To prevent erosion of the European Social Models and of popular support for European integration, the politicians have to reinsert themselves into the governance of the European project. A pertinent start would be to ensure that the rising mass of cross-border service workers in Europe become subject to the same rights and standards as their fellow workers in the emerging pan-European labour market.
机译:本文分析了欧盟在共同体赖以生存的三个基本原则上面临的三难困境:服务和劳动力的自由流动;不歧视和平等待遇以及结社权和产业行动权。随着东扩后跨界服务和(已过帐)劳务的不断增加,这些权利之间的冲突引发了劳资纠纷和司法纠纷。在拉瓦尔四方会议上强调的欧洲法院(ECJ)认为,某些原则比其他原则更为根本。追溯欧洲一体化发展的“双轨”,即超国家市场一体化与工业关系和社会政策中的国家半主权相结合,我们的主张是,欧洲法院判决所隐含的自由流动高于基本社会权利在政治和社会上不可持续的方向上领导欧洲。为了防止侵蚀欧洲社会模式和公众对欧洲一体化的支持,政客们必须重新将自己融入欧洲项目的治理中。一个适当的开端将是确保欧洲不断增长的跨境服务工人与新兴的泛欧洲劳动力市场上的同胞享有相同的权利和标准。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Industrial relations journal》 |2009年第6期|491-509|共19页
  • 作者

    Jon Erik Dolvik; Jelle Visser;

  • 作者单位

    Research at FAFO (FAFO Institute for Applied Social Sciences), based in Oslo FAFO, Postbox 2947,Toyen, N-0608, Oslo, Norway;

    AIAS (Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies),University of Amsterdam;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:11:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号