首页> 外文期刊>Industrial relations journal >Holding the Shop Together: German Industrial Relations in the Postwar Era
【24h】

Holding the Shop Together: German Industrial Relations in the Postwar Era

机译:携手共进:战后时代的德国劳资关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The German system of industrial relations tends to strike the British observer as both alien and familiar at the same time. Alien, because German ways are not as ours: sector-level bargaining, legally enforceable collective agreements, works councils and employee board-level participation. Yet familiar because-since the collapse of the Berlin Wall-the burgeoning 'varieties of capitalism' literature has generally presented Germany as the paradigm coordinated market economy that contrasts with the UK as a liberal market economy. We have accordingly become familiar with the role of banks, supply chains and the stock market in the development of German 'patient capital', and how they all fit into the broader jigsaw of economic and social relationships. The problem is that this familiarity can become ossified. Our understanding of 'the German model' risks degenerating into a glib stereotype that we trundle out whenever its suits us to find a contrast to the ever-liberalising tendencies in the UK. 'If only we were more like the Germans' becomes a refrain based on an image, a perception of Germany rather than-maybe-the German 'reality' of a society itself undergoing deep, individualising change in its own way. The challenge, then, is to remain alive to the complexities of the continuing evolution of the model, a challenge that might prove particularly demanding for non-German speakers. So for this reason, I wholeheartedly welcome this new book by Stephen J. Silvia on German industrial relations in the postwar era.
机译:德国的劳资关系体系趋向于同时打击外国人和熟悉的英国观察员。外星人,因为德国人的方式不尽人意:部门一级的讨价还价,具有法律效力的集体协议,劳动委员会和员工董事会一级的参与。但自从柏林墙倒塌以来,人们就很熟悉了,新兴的“资本主义多样性”文学大体上将德国视为协调市场经济的范式,而英国则与自由市场经济形成鲜明对比。因此,我们已经熟悉了银行,供应链和股票市场在德国“耐心资本”发展中的作用,以及它们如何适应更广泛的经济和社会关系拼图。问题在于这种熟悉会变得僵化。我们对“德国模式”的理解可能会沦为一种愚蠢的刻板印象,只要有适合我们的发现,我们就会tr之以鼻,以与英国不断开放的趋势形成对比。 “如果我们更像德国人”会成为基于图像的克制,那就是对德国的感知,而不是对德国的感知,而不是也许-社会自身经历深刻,个性化变革的德国“现实”。因此,挑战在于如何应对模型的不断发展所带来的复杂性,这一挑战可能对非德语发言者尤为苛刻。因此,出于这个原因,我衷心欢迎斯蒂芬·西尔维亚(Stephen J. Silvia)撰写的这本有关战后德国劳资关系的新书。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Industrial relations journal》 |2015年第2期|169-170|共2页
  • 作者

    Michael Gold;

  • 作者单位

    Royal Holloway University of London;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:11:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号