...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and Systems Engineering at Work >A giant leap forward - eventually
【24h】

A giant leap forward - eventually

机译:一个巨大的飞跃 - 最终

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I recently came across an article from the BBC titled "Why didn't electricity immediately change manufacturing?" The parallels to modern day healthcare and the "electrification" of medical records via the implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) are worth discussing. In 1881, Thomas Edison built electricity generating stations in Manhattan and London, and within the next year, electricity was being sold as a commodity. A year later, the first electric motors were driving manufacturing machinery in factories. Despite the quick development, in 1900 only 5% of mechanical drive power in U.S. factories was from electric motors. In traditional steam-powered factories, the power came from large coal-fire steam engines that rarely stopped, created a lot of grease and dust, and were hazardous for workers. Some factory owners did implement electric motors, drawing upon clean energy from a nearby generating station. But despite the huge investment, they did not see immediate savings. "Why? Because to take advantage of electricity, factory owners had to think in a very different way," the BBC reported.
机译:我最近遇到了一篇名为“为什么不立即改变制造业的电力的文章”通过实施电子健康记录(EHRS)的医疗记录(EHRS)的近日医疗保健和“电气化”是值得的。 1881年,托马斯爱迪生建造了曼哈顿和伦敦的发电站,在明年内,电力被销售为商品。一年后,第一台电动机正在推动工厂的制造机械。尽管发展快速,但在1900年,美国工厂中只有5%的机械驱动力来自电动机。在传统的蒸汽动力工厂中,电力来自大型煤火蒸汽发动机,速度很少停止,造成了大量的油脂和灰尘,对工人造成危险。一些工厂所有者确实实施了电动机,从附近的发电站绘制清洁能量。但尽管投资巨大,但他们没有看到立即节省。 “为什么?因为为了利用电力,工厂所有者必须以非常不同的方式思考,”BBC报道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号