...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and Corporate Change >Industry institutions, social capital, and firm participation in industrial development
【24h】

Industry institutions, social capital, and firm participation in industrial development

机译:工业机构,社会资本和企业参与工业发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Industry institutions and trade associations represent the “collective interests” of an industry's constituent firms and play a prominent role in industrial development. Yet, the strength and efficacy of industry institutions to promote these “collective interests,” depends upon the active support and participation of member firms. This is essentially a collective action problem. By aligning Olson's (1971) logics of collective action framework with Nahapiet and Ghoshal's (1998) dimensions of social capital, this article uses survey data from 381 firms from across five UK manufacturing sectors to explore the factors that affect the propensity for firms to participate in industry institution led initiatives. The results suggest the propensity of firms participating in collective activities rises where “shared interests” emerge, although the over-riding factor is the extent to which firms perceive their own ability to influence and shape the direction of such activities (the logic of influence).
机译:行业机构和行业协会代表着行业组成企业的“集体利益”,并在工业发展中发挥着重要作用。但是,行业机构促进这些“集体利益”的力量和效力取决于成员公司的积极支持和参与。这本质上是一个集体行动问题。通过将奥尔森(1971)的集体行动框架逻辑与纳哈皮特(Nahapiet)和戈绍尔(Ghoshal)(1998)的社会资本维度相结合,本文使用了来自英国五个制造业领域的381家公司的调查数据,探讨了影响公司参与倾向的因素。行业机构主导的举措。结果表明,尽管“压倒一切的因素”是企业感知自己影响和塑造这种活动方向的能力的程度,但参与集体活动的公司的倾向性在“共有利益”出现的地方会增加。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号