首页> 外文期刊>The Indian concrete journal >Comparative study of three techniques for assessment of in-situ strength of concrete
【24h】

Comparative study of three techniques for assessment of in-situ strength of concrete

机译:三种评估混凝土现场强度的技术的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two of the most commonly used NDT methods for the approximate estimation of strength of concrete in structures are rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV). It is also possible to assess in-situ strength of structural grade concrete indirectly through the knowledge of its pore structural characteristics obtained from mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Hence, in this study the in-situ strength of structural grade concrete in laboratory-cast beam specimens was assessed using MIP, rebound hammer and UPV test methods. A comparative study among these three methods of strength assessment carried out by using suitable statistical parameters suggests that the mercury intrusion porosimetery technique of strength assessment of concrete is as reliable as the rebound hammer and UPV test methods.
机译:估计结构中混凝土强度的两种最常用的NDT方法是回弹锤和超声脉冲速度(UPV)。通过从压汞法(MIP)获得的孔隙结构特征的知识,也可以间接评估结构等级混凝土的现场强度。因此,在这项研究中,使用MIP,回弹锤和UPV测试方法评估了实验室浇铸梁样本中结构级混凝土的现场强度。通过使用适当的统计参数对这三种强度评估方法进行的比较研究表明,混凝土强度评估的压汞法与回弹锤和UPV测试方法一样可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号