首页> 外文期刊>The Indian concrete journal >Stringer panel approach for a strength behaviour study of a flanged shear wall
【24h】

Stringer panel approach for a strength behaviour study of a flanged shear wall

机译:桁架面板法用于剪力墙的强度行为研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents an analytical investigation on the applicability of Stringer Panel Model (SPM) forflanged shear wall structures and compares the results with Strut and Tie Model (STM), Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and a shear wall tested in Canada. The FEA and experimental results were taken from the available literature. However, developing the optimal topology for STM requires rigorous methods like Evolutionary Structural Optimization of the FEA results. So a simple analogous frame idealisation was clubbed with the STM to get the topology. Even though the literature shows that Finite Element Method (FEM) predicts lateral load capacity, displacement and behaviour more accurately and realistically than SPM or STM, both these non-FEM models give acceptable results for design purposes. Between the two, the SPM gave a better estimate of the load capacity than the STM and was easier to practice than FEM. Based on these experiences, SPM is recommended for estimating the load capacity of flanged shear walls subjected to lateral loads.
机译:本文对桁架面板模型(SPM)在法兰剪力墙结构中的适用性进行了分析研究,并将结果与​​Strut and Tie模型(STM),有限元分析(FEA)以及在加拿大测试的剪力墙进行了比较。 FEA和实验结果取自现有文献。但是,为STM开发最佳拓扑需要严格的方法,例如FEA结果的进化结构优化。因此,将简单的类似框架理想化与STM结合在一起以获得拓扑。尽管文献表明有限元方法(FEM)可以比SPM或STM更准确,更实际地预测侧向载荷能力,位移和行为,但是这两种非FEM模型都为设计目的提供了可接受的结果。在这两者之间,SPM比STM更好地估计了负载能力,比FEM更易于实践。基于这些经验,建议使用SPM估算承受侧向荷载的带凸缘剪力墙的荷载能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号