【24h】

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

机译:致编辑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dear Mr Ashish Patil, From your Editorial (February 2016), I find that this issue is containing very interesting papers. You have noted that a paper has the following contents "Spray-on curing compounds are being widely used in construction, where traditional methods of curing are not practical. Four main types of curing compounds based on water, resin, wax and acrylic were selected and their efficiency in terms of compressive strength was studied. The authors note that IS 456:2000 recommendation on the use of curing compounds as an alternative to moist curing assuming 100% efficiency is quite liberal, and that it would be safe to consider a curing efficiency of 70% for structural elements coated with curing compounds."
机译:亲爱的Ashish Patil先生,根据您的社论(2016年2月),我发现本期包含非常有趣的论文。您已经注意到,论文的内容如下:“喷涂固化剂正在建筑中广泛使用,传统的固化方法不可行。选择了四种主要类型的基于水,树脂,蜡和丙烯酸的固化剂,作者研究了它们的抗压强度效率,作者指出,IS 456:2000建议使用固化化合物替代湿固化,因为假定100%的效率是相当宽松的,考虑固化效率将是安全的涂有固化剂的结构元件的重量百分比为70%。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Indian concrete journal》 |2016年第5期|6-6|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:24:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号